A prognosis for the culture wars « Political Science Rumors

1 week - 43 posts - Latest - RSS
OP: 10 Goods vs 1 No Goods
Thread: 97 Goods vs 52 No Goods

Political Science Rumors » Job Market » General Political Science Job Market Discussion

A prognosis for the culture wars

« Previous 123 Next »

Gina

Lol. The misogynists of PSR. At it again.
There is no misogyny here. Kling is not making value judgements. Just pointing out the obvious- women are entering certain institutions and spheres of life, for the first time in the history of our specifies, and it’s going to have consequences, good or bad.

And blaming all the resulting frictions on men or “fragility” is silly and wrong.

Kling isn't "pointing out" anything. He's making an argument. A misogynist argument.

Of course, the misogynist bros of PSR are going to lap it up.

1 week ago # QUOTE 0 YEA 5 NAY !
Kristel

Lol. The misogynists of PSR. At it again.

Do you think the weeping session in Congress led by AOC could have taken place 10 years ago? 10000 years ago?

Isn’t that an interesting change in the institution of “government” that is worth examining? And is it because of feminine influence? Is it misogyny to ask this question?

1 week ago # QUOTE 5 YEA 2 NAY !
Gina

Lol. The misogynists of PSR. At it again.

Do you think the weeping session in Congress led by AOC could have taken place 10 years ago? 10000 years ago?
Isn’t that an interesting change in the institution of “government” that is worth examining? And is it because of feminine influence? Is it misogyny to ask this question?

Why do you come to this site? This is a board for working academics. You clearly are not one of us.

1 week ago # QUOTE 4 YEA 4 NAY !
Kristel

Military generals? Hahah!

Ok pedant, replace that with “military leader”, someone whose decisions risk many lives including their own.

1 week ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 1 NAY !
Kristel

Military generals? Hahah!
Ok pedant, replace that with “military leader”, someone whose decisions risk many lives including their own.

Unlike your work, which is evaluated based on peer-review by your colleagues, with no objective measure of performance, and no real consequences for mistakes.

1 week ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 0 NAY !
Gina

Military generals? Hahah!
Ok pedant, replace that with “military leader”, someone whose decisions risk many lives including their own.

Unlike your work, which is evaluated based on peer-review by your colleagues, with no objective measure of performance, and no real consequences for mistakes.

Answer my question: Why do you come to this site? This is a board for working academics. You clearly are not one of us.

1 week ago # QUOTE 1 YEA 3 NAY !
Pearce

Military generals? Hahah!
Ok pedant, replace that with “military leader”, someone whose decisions risk many lives including their own.

No, no. I'm laughing at the thought they are on the up and up. They are dragging SJWs into brass left and right.

1 week ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 0 NAY !
Shiloh

Lol. The misogynists of PSR. At it again.
Do you think the weeping session in Congress led by AOC could have taken place 10 years ago? 10000 years ago?
Isn’t that an interesting change in the institution of “government” that is worth examining? And is it because of feminine influence? Is it misogyny to ask this question?

Why do you come to this site? This is a board for working academics. You clearly are not one of us.

First answer my question implied above. They are critical, life-or-death questions:

Is the norm “leaders should be stoic and never show weakness or vulnerability”, one known on elementary school playgrounds and corporate boardrooms, followed by leaders for thousands of years, valuable?

It’s being broken by US politicians increasingly. Is it cause for concern? Is it happening due to increasing involvement of women in US politics? How many other such norms are being desecrated to appease women, like free speech, due process etc.?

Is it misogynistic to even ask these questions? Can silencing these questions lead to the downfall of institutions? Societies?

1 week ago # QUOTE 7 YEA 1 NAY !
Amie

Lol. The misogynists of PSR. At it again.
Do you think the weeping session in Congress led by AOC could have taken place 10 years ago? 10000 years ago?
Isn’t that an interesting change in the institution of “government” that is worth examining? And is it because of feminine influence? Is it misogyny to ask this question?
Why do you come to this site? This is a board for working academics. You clearly are not one of us.

First answer my question implied above. They are critical, life-or-death questions:
Is the norm “leaders should be stoic and never show weakness or vulnerability”, one known on elementary school playgrounds and corporate boardrooms, followed by leaders for thousands of years, valuable?
It’s being broken by US politicians increasingly. Is it cause for concern? Is it happening due to increasing involvement of women in US politics? How many other such norms are being desecrated to appease women, like free speech, due process etc.?
Is it misogynistic to even ask these questions? Can silencing these questions lead to the downfall of institutions? Societies?

Why do you come to a site where you don’t belong?

1 week ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 2 NAY !
Amie

Not such a bad change as it seems. Remember that the flood of third world immigrants happened during the older culture. The subversion of universities happened during the older culture. Marginalization of nationalist forces that are necessary for survival happened during the older culture.

At least the current stuff can provoke decent backlash. The previous recipe was that of a slow gradual death, and the public submitted to it too readily. Hopefully, the backlash can rejuvenate things like it did in Italy: https://voxeu.org/article/revisiting-rise-italian-fascism

1 week ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 1 NAY !
Kayla

Lol. The misogynists of PSR. At it again.
Do you think the weeping session in Congress led by AOC could have taken place 10 years ago? 10000 years ago?
Isn’t that an interesting change in the institution of “government” that is worth examining? And is it because of feminine influence? Is it misogyny to ask this question?
Why do you come to this site? This is a board for working academics. You clearly are not one of us.
First answer my question implied above. They are critical, life-or-death questions:
Is the norm “leaders should be stoic and never show weakness or vulnerability”, one known on elementary school playgrounds and corporate boardrooms, followed by leaders for thousands of years, valuable?
It’s being broken by US politicians increasingly. Is it cause for concern? Is it happening due to increasing involvement of women in US politics? How many other such norms are being desecrated to appease women, like free speech, due process etc.?
Is it misogynistic to even ask these questions? Can silencing these questions lead to the downfall of institutions? Societies?

Why do you come to a site where you don’t belong?

To be fair, this is what an SJW would say.

1 week ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 0 NAY !
Steven

N 1 is BS: differential rewards are here to stay. The most exclusive and elitist institutions are super woke.

1 week ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 0 NAY !
Ilean

Why do you come to a site where you don’t belong?

You’ve been sh!tting all over this thread. Isn’t it easier to just ignore? Something about this topic is really bothering you. Please introspect.

1 week ago # QUOTE 1 YEA 0 NAY !
Sharyl

Why do you come to a site where you don’t belong?

You’ve been sh!tting all over this thread. Isn’t it easier to just ignore? Something about this topic is really bothering you. Please introspect.

That's a great question: why do you come to this site? You clearly aren't a working academic.

1 week ago # QUOTE 0 YEA 2 NAY !
Lolicia

Military generals? Hahah!

LOL !!!

1 week ago # QUOTE 0 YEA 0 NAY !
Lolicia

Why do you come to a site where you don’t belong?

He is a cow@rd!

1 week ago # QUOTE 0 YEA 0 NAY !
Evelyn

Embarrassing post

1 week ago # QUOTE 0 YEA 0 NAY !
Judy

The main difference between old and new is that most Boomers have never known anything but prosperity, while most millennials have never known anything but recession. It has little to nothing to do with performance or competence.

1 week ago # QUOTE 0 YEA 0 NAY !

« Previous 123 Next »

A prognosis for the culture wars

Reply »