If you believe so strongly that this was a case of corruption, just post your evidence.
Biden corruption is banned subject on PSR.
-
I mean, snide insinuations are cool and all. But... that's usually what people do when they don't actually have evidence for their claims.
So your contention is that these transactions are aboveboard. Why then, would Biden deny that they ever occurred?
I don't know why this is so difficult for you. If there is any evidence of corruption in this transaction, then just post it here.
Why are you having such a hard time doing so?
Answer my question. If these transactions are aboveboard, why would Biden deny that they ever occurred?How would I know? I'm not Joe Biden.
Now answer my question: why are you having such a difficult time posting any evidence of corruption in this transaction? -
I already described this particular issue to you. To recap yet again:
Robinson Walker, a Biden family associate, received a $3 million wire from a Shanghai-based Chinese company in March 2017. He then transferred $1.065 million of those funds via wire and banking transfer to several Biden personal and company accounts from March 6th to May 18th.
The Chinese company in question is a CEFC affiliate. CEFC was run by Ye Jianming, who was convicted by the US DOJ for offering a br!be to the president of Chad for oil rights in late 2017 and depositing a $500K br!be in a bank account designated by the minister for foreign affairs in Uganda.
Consequently, contemporaneous deposits made effectively by Ye to the Bidens are also suspect.
Additional considerations:
If this was a work-related reimbursement, why would Hallie Biden have been included?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why use a private individual's LLC as an intermediary?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why are the payments broken down into smaller amounts and parceled out over three months?
-
I already described this particular issue to you. To recap yet again:
Robinson Walker, a Biden family associate, received a $3 million wire from a Shanghai-based Chinese company in March 2017. He then transferred $1.065 million of those funds via wire and banking transfer to several Biden personal and company accounts from March 6th to May 18th.
The Chinese company in question is a CEFC affiliate. CEFC was run by Ye Jianming, who was convicted by the US DOJ for offering a br!be to the president of Chad for oil rights in late 2017 and depositing a $500K br!be in a bank account designated by the minister for foreign affairs in Uganda.
Consequently, contemporaneous deposits made effectively by Ye to the Bidens are also suspect.
Additional considerations:
If this was a work-related reimbursement, why would Hallie Biden have been included?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why use a private individual's LLC as an intermediary?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why are the payments broken down into smaller amounts and parceled out over three months?So, a serious of rhetorical questions. That's not really what we call evidence.
Now answer my question: why are you having such a difficult time posting any evidence of corruption in this transaction? If you have evidence, just post it. We're now on the third page and you've still failed to post anything of the sort.
I wonder why?
-
I already described this particular issue to you. To recap yet again:
Robinson Walker, a Biden family associate, received a $3 million wire from a Shanghai-based Chinese company in March 2017. He then transferred $1.065 million of those funds via wire and banking transfer to several Biden personal and company accounts from March 6th to May 18th.
The Chinese company in question is a CEFC affiliate. CEFC was run by Ye Jianming, who was convicted by the US DOJ for offering a br!be to the president of Chad for oil rights in late 2017 and depositing a $500K br!be in a bank account designated by the minister for foreign affairs in Uganda.
Consequently, contemporaneous deposits made effectively by Ye to the Bidens are also suspect.
Additional considerations:
If this was a work-related reimbursement, why would Hallie Biden have been included?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why use a private individual's LLC as an intermediary?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why are the payments broken down into smaller amounts and parceled out over three months?So, a serious of rhetorical questions. That's not really what we call evidence.
Now answer my question: why are you having such a difficult time posting any evidence of corruption in this transaction? If you have evidence, just post it. We're now on the third page and you've still failed to post anything of the sort.
I wonder why?You are really confused. The evidence is the series of transactions. The questions are worth asking in this context.
They are not "rhetorical." A rhetorical question has a presumptive answer and these do not.
I mean, I get that right-wing twitter has told you that you're supposed to be all mad about this. But try to think for yourself.
You've been invited to think for yourself with at least four questions. You've failed to do so, each time.
-
I already described this particular issue to you. To recap yet again:
Robinson Walker, a Biden family associate, received a $3 million wire from a Shanghai-based Chinese company in March 2017. He then transferred $1.065 million of those funds via wire and banking transfer to several Biden personal and company accounts from March 6th to May 18th.
The Chinese company in question is a CEFC affiliate. CEFC was run by Ye Jianming, who was convicted by the US DOJ for offering a br!be to the president of Chad for oil rights in late 2017 and depositing a $500K br!be in a bank account designated by the minister for foreign affairs in Uganda.
Consequently, contemporaneous deposits made effectively by Ye to the Bidens are also suspect.
Additional considerations:
If this was a work-related reimbursement, why would Hallie Biden have been included?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why use a private individual's LLC as an intermediary?
If this was a work-related reimbursement and above-board, why are the payments broken down into smaller amounts and parceled out over three months?
So, a serious of rhetorical questions. That's not really what we call evidence.
Now answer my question: why are you having such a difficult time posting any evidence of corruption in this transaction? If you have evidence, just post it. We're now on the third page and you've still failed to post anything of the sort.
I wonder why?You are really confused. The evidence is the series of transactions. The questions are worth asking in this context.
They are not "rhetorical." A rhetorical question has a presumptive answer and these do not.
I mean, I get that right-wing twitter has told you that you're supposed to be all mad about this. But try to think for yourself.You've been invited to think for yourself with at least four questions. You've failed to do so, each time.
It's now the third page. You still haven't managed to post a single piece of evidence that these transactions speak to corruption.
I wonder why you're having such a hard time doing so? If you've got any evidence of corruption, just post it.
This is actually getting hilarious. :)