Thanks for confirming this is a 10-year low in the ISM, exactly as I wrote! Really refreshing for you to admit that.
I wish you had the same honesty regarding your lie about the 2016 deficit. Or the trade deficit. Or the mediocre growth. Or...
Or the slower job creation than under Obama, or the rapidly declining consumer confidence.
Wow, NOW somebody wants to do nuance. But not when talking about the deficits under Obama's first term. Dishonest, Celia. But I'll still accept your apology.
ISM "raised concern about a recession even after two straight interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. Slowing global growth has damped demand for manufactured goods at home and abroad while trade policy uncertainty has disturbed supply chains and put hiring plans on hold."
Hahahaha, this is what counts as a success for conservatives!Wow, laying slowing global growth at the feet of US domestic policy is really stupid.
There is literally nowhere in the ISM report that says manufacturing has been trending down for a year. This is directly contradicted by the quote I posted.
Nor does it claim manufacturing is at its worst in 30 years. Again, this flies directly in the face of the quote I posted.
You on the other hand continue to make wholly unsupported claims.
You clearly can't tell the difference between annual deficits and the debt.
You're a liar. Not a big surprise that, you people lie about everything.
Poor baby doesn't like these mean facts!
ISM at its worst in 10 years: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/u-s-factory-gauge-sinks-to-10-year-low-as-employment-wobbles
Different measure has it worst in 30, but if you prefer the one saying 10, here you go.
Note no defense on deficits. You were caught in an outright lie on 2016. You have no response to fact that Obama reduced the deficit and trump has exploded the deficit.
No defense on weak job growth, record trade deficit, no wage growth, etc., etc.
You've got nothing and you know it. This is what conservatism always brings: decay and decline.
You idiot, this is what the ISM report says:
"A PMI above 42.9 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy. Therefore, the September PMI indicates growth for the 125th consecutive month in the overall economy, and the second month of contraction following 35 straight months of growth in the manufacturing sector."
So let's get that straight:
The overall economy is still growing.
The September PMI is a second month of contraction FOLLOWING 35 MONTHS OF UNINTERRUPTED MANUFACTURING GROWTH.
https://www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/ismreport/mfgrob.cfm?SSO=1
A paragraph from YOUR OWN (for the most part badly written and misleading article):
"The second straight reading below 50 -- the line separating expansion and contraction -- extends the drop from a 14-year high just over a year earlier and raised concern about a recession even after two straight interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. Slowing global growth has damped demand for manufactured goods at home and abroad while trade policy uncertainty has disturbed supply chains and put hiring plans on hold."
Thanks for confirming this is a 10-year low in the ISM, exactly as I wrote! Really refreshing for you to admit that.
I wish you had the same honesty regarding your lie about the 2016 deficit. Or the trade deficit. Or the mediocre growth. Or...BWAHAHA... You can't even tell the difference between the ISM - the organization that conducts the survey - and the PMI. Hint: the PMI is the score.
Do you even understand that it's not a measure of overall manufacturing activity but a survey indicating overall direction of manufacturing growth or contraction? Apparently not.
What a moron.
What are you babbling about now? It's widely referred to as the ISM index. If you read the news or had basic economic literacy, you'd probably know that.
But thanks again for admitting it's at a 10-year low! Must be really embarrassing to get publicly owned like that, but you're really leaning in. Same with admitting you lied about the deficit. Better luck next time, little guy!
ISM "raised concern about a recession even after two straight interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. Slowing global growth has damped demand for manufactured goods at home and abroad while trade policy uncertainty has disturbed supply chains and put hiring plans on hold."
Hahahaha, this is what counts as a success for conservatives!Wow, laying slowing global growth at the feet of US domestic policy is really stupid.
Hahahahaha, it's appropriate when there's near-universal agreement that trump's failed trade war has directly contributed to weak global growth. Maybe try reading an actual news source some time.
Thanks for confirming this is a 10-year low in the ISM, exactly as I wrote! Really refreshing for you to admit that.
I wish you had the same honesty regarding your lie about the 2016 deficit. Or the trade deficit. Or the mediocre growth. Or...BWAHAHA... You can't even tell the difference between the ISM - the organization that conducts the survey - and the PMI. Hint: the PMI is the score.
Do you even understand that it's not a measure of overall manufacturing activity but a survey indicating overall direction of manufacturing growth or contraction? Apparently not.
What a moron.What are you babbling about now? It's widely referred to as the ISM index. If you read the news or had basic economic literacy, you'd probably know that.
But thanks again for admitting it's at a 10-year low! Must be really embarrassing to get publicly owned like that, but you're really leaning in. Same with admitting you lied about the deficit. Better luck next time, little guy!
Doubling down on the fact that you don't understand the PMI, or what it measures, or the fact that manufacturing has been growing for nearly three years before this month's contraction.
Thanks for confirming this is a 10-year low in the ISM, exactly as I wrote! Really refreshing for you to admit that.
I wish you had the same honesty regarding your lie about the 2016 deficit. Or the trade deficit. Or the mediocre growth. Or...
BWAHAHA... You can't even tell the difference between the ISM - the organization that conducts the survey - and the PMI. Hint: the PMI is the score.
Do you even understand that it's not a measure of overall manufacturing activity but a survey indicating overall direction of manufacturing growth or contraction? Apparently not.
What a moron.
What are you babbling about now? It's widely referred to as the ISM index. If you read the news or had basic economic literacy, you'd probably know that.
But thanks again for admitting it's at a 10-year low! Must be really embarrassing to get publicly owned like that, but you're really leaning in. Same with admitting you lied about the deficit. Better luck next time, little guy!Doubling down on the fact that you don't understand the PMI, or what it measures, or the fact that manufacturing has been growing for nearly three years before this month's contraction.
Hahaha, poor guy thought he had me on some index terminology thing (grab what you can get!), but he just ended up embarrassing himself more! I love how you're just evading the fact it's at a 10-year low and hoping no one notices? Maybe if you babble some more about index names you can avoid having to deal with this. How's the trade deficit doing, by the way?
Thanks for confirming this is a 10-year low in the ISM, exactly as I wrote! Really refreshing for you to admit that.
I wish you had the same honesty regarding your lie about the 2016 deficit. Or the trade deficit. Or the mediocre growth. Or...
BWAHAHA... You can't even tell the difference between the ISM - the organization that conducts the survey - and the PMI. Hint: the PMI is the score.
Do you even understand that it's not a measure of overall manufacturing activity but a survey indicating overall direction of manufacturing growth or contraction? Apparently not.
What a moron.
What are you babbling about now? It's widely referred to as the ISM index. If you read the news or had basic economic literacy, you'd probably know that.
But thanks again for admitting it's at a 10-year low! Must be really embarrassing to get publicly owned like that, but you're really leaning in. Same with admitting you lied about the deficit. Better luck next time, little guy!
Doubling down on the fact that you don't understand the PMI, or what it measures, or the fact that manufacturing has been growing for nearly three years before this month's contraction.Hahaha, poor guy thought he had me on some index terminology thing (grab what you can get!), but he just ended up embarrassing himself more! I love how you're just evading the fact it's at a 10-year low and hoping no one notices? Maybe if you babble some more about index names you can avoid having to deal with this. How's the trade deficit doing, by the way?
Still covering up that he doesn't know squat about the ISM, confuses it with the PMI, and doesn't have the faintest clue what the PMI actually indicates.
Still covering up that he doesn't know squat about the ISM, confuses it with the PMI, and doesn't have the faintest clue what the PMI actually indicates.
Trump sucks. Worst president in history. Stop covering up.
Lowest unemployment in 50 years.
Historically low unemployment for almost all major minority groups.
Better and more consistent GDP growth than Obama.
The fact that you can't stomach this is telling.
Lowest unemployment in 50 years.
Historically low unemployment for almost all major minority groups.
Better and more consistent GDP growth than Obama.
The fact that you can't stomach this is telling.
Trump is on the record at least 19 times saying UE is fake. So go ahead and strike your first two claims
That leaves you with: "Trump's lousy GDP growth figures are more consistent than Obama's lousy GDP growth figures!"
Lowest unemployment in 50 years.
Historically low unemployment for almost all major minority groups.
Better and more consistent GDP growth than Obama.
The fact that you can't stomach this is telling.Trump is on the record at least 19 times saying UE is fake. So go ahead and strike your first two claims
That leaves you with: "Trump's lousy GDP growth figures are more consistent than Obama's lousy GDP growth figures!"
Trump's GDP growth figures are more consistent and on average higher than Obama's GDP growth figures, which - even excluding 2009 - were extremely uneven.
Context matters. High and dropping unemployment in the context of sinking labor force participation is not the same as historically low unemployment in the context of increasing labor force participation.
Trump's GDP growth figures are more consistent and on average higher than Obama's GDP growth figures, which - even excluding 2009 - were extremely uneven.
Context matters. High and dropping unemployment in the context of sinking labor force participation is not the same as historically low unemployment in the context of increasing labor force participation.
We heard you the first time, Townhall Troll.
"Trump's lousy GDP growth figures are more consistent than Obama's lousy GDP growth figures."
Context: Trump's economic record is the worst in history.
Lowest unemployment in 50 years.
Historically low unemployment for almost all major minority groups.
Better and more consistent GDP growth than Obama.
The fact that you can't stomach this is telling.
Trump is on the record at least 19 times saying UE is fake. So go ahead and strike your first two claims
That leaves you with: "Trump's lousy GDP growth figures are more consistent than Obama's lousy GDP growth figures!"Trump's GDP growth figures are more consistent and on average higher than Obama's GDP growth figures, which - even excluding 2009 - were extremely uneven.
Context matters. High and dropping unemployment in the context of sinking labor force participation is not the same as historically low unemployment in the context of increasing labor force participation.
Hahaha, look at this sad liar keep going. Somehow, we're supposed to believe that variation in growth is now incredibly important, because that's all they have.
Fact is trump's growth is indistinguishable from Obama's. But difference is trump inherited a growing economy and Obama inherited a plummeting one. Anyone who denies that's an advantage for Obama is a partisan tool.
And let's not forget Obama reduced the deficit and trump has exploded it. Virtually all the unemployment reduction happened under Obama. Stock market growth? Trade deficit? Wage growth? All better under Obama.
Game set match. Maybe try lying about deficits or babbling about the official name of some index to distract from you getting owned. Worked great so far.