Maybe because 90 percent of those cites were from before he was hired? Based on pubs since his hiring date alone, he wouldn't have been promoted at a hell of a lot of good places.
APSR has a corrigendum that includes an omitted citation. What it leaves unsaid is that the citation in question developed the formal model he claimed in the article was his own.
APSR has a corrigendum that includes an omitted citation. What it leaves unsaid is that the citation in question developed the formal model he claimed in the article was his own.
How is anyone surprised by this?
The econ pubs are gonna have like 5 times as many cites as even the best PS pubs, so although the citations are -ish right now, in 10-15 years he'll be much stronger than those who can't publish in econ.