Big hire
Canes-Wrone -> Stanford
-
Has she ever had an idea? She doesn't know much about actual politics, which is the way they like it at Stanford.
I will take Canes-Wrone's work 7 days a week and twice on Sunday over most of the research that gets through APSR these days.
Boring methodsy work about questions we know the answer to feels right for PSR
-
Has she ever had an idea? She doesn't know much about actual politics, which is the way they like it at Stanford.
I will take Canes-Wrone's work 7 days a week and twice on Sunday over most of the research that gets through APSR these days.Boring methodsy work about questions we know the answer to feels right for PSR
We all can't do exciting work like fetal citizenship at immigration detention centers.
-
Has she ever had an idea? She doesn't know much about actual politics, which is the way they like it at Stanford.
I will take Canes-Wrone's work 7 days a week and twice on Sunday over most of the research that gets through APSR these days.Boring methodsy work about questions we know the answer to feels right for PSR.
We all can't do exciting work like fetal citizenship at immigration detention centers.
LOL !!!
-
She's been bopping around top departments for 25 years and no one associates her with anything in particular except "woman, from Stanford, methods." No ideas. No interesting findings. And when pressed on this the only defense is "I don't like the woke stuff". Nothing affirmative about her. It's very sad and says a lot about where polisci was before the "woke stuff". People who have nothing to say in top positions saying nothing.
Semi-relatedly, at one time this thread would have gone for pages because this is a move by a prominent (for no reason, but whatever) person going from one major dept to another. No matter how boring she is personally, that would lead to LOTS of discussion. How would it affect Princeton and Stanford etc. But this place has really collapsed now and most people who come here don't even know who she is, probably.
-
This is the problem with poli sci lately. Flip through any of the top journals (maybe with a minor exception for some recent APSR stuff and Jenkins era JOP) in the last 10 years and its painfully boring causal inference stuff on issues nobody cares about or were settled in the 1990s
-
This is the problem with poli sci lately. Flip through any of the top journals (maybe with a minor exception for some recent APSR stuff and Jenkins era JOP) in the last 10 years and its painfully boring causal inference stuff on issues nobody cares about or were settled in the 1990s
-
Semi-relatedly, at one time this thread would have gone for pages because this is a move by a prominent (for no reason, but whatever) person going from one major dept to another. No matter how boring she is personally, that would lead to LOTS of discussion. How would it affect Princeton and Stanford etc. But this place has really collapsed now and most people who come here don't even know who she is, probably.
^ 100% accurate. 2015 PSR would have droned on for 15 pages about a move like this. 2022 PSR is mostly silent because the bros here now only know about academic political science via Twitter, not direct personal knowledge. BCW is not on Twitter, so the bros have no idea what this is about.
-
Has she ever had an idea? She doesn't know much about actual politics, which is the way they like it at Stanford.
I will take Canes-Wrone's work 7 days a week and twice on Sunday over most of the research that gets through APSR these days.
There is no research getting through APSR these days