It's somewhat unnerving to watch Karl becoming completely unraveled as his mental illness progresses.
It's like watching a very bad train wreck in slow motion.
^ This
It's somewhat unnerving to watch Karl becoming completely unraveled as his mental illness progresses.
It's like watching a very bad train wreck in slow motion.^ This
He's like Amber Heard, just keeps talking and digging his own hole deeper and deeper and deeper ...
wow Gregg Re woke up in the middle of the night to attack the lawyers who threatened his lover boy Karl
p.s. is there a Stockholm Syndrome, but for Daily Caller bloggers who let other Daily Caller bloggers who now have a @fox.com email address and think they're more intimidating than they are, steal their content?
https://www.poliscirumors.com/topic/gregg-re-steals-content-from-bloggers-for-tucker-carlson
https://www.poliscirumors.com/topic/links-that-gregg-re-does-not-want-you-to-see
none of this changes the fact that the centerpiece of Enos' corpus is bogus, AJPS has made up preposterous excuses not to do anything about it, and the editors are now trying to use a legal threat to try to stop people from bringing this to our attention.
yah but nobody cares cuz Gregg Re probably stole the story from someone else and gave it to Karl so that Tuck don't get sued
so unless someone else outside of the Daily Caller "just-the-tip" trifecta report on this story, we don't care
There is nothing to the Enos claim, but the MPSA lawyer f-ed up very, very badly.
Chris, here is your career advice:
Drop Enos. You don't have the data from the anonymous memo and given that you didn't get it by now, I don't think you will ever get it.
Pursue MPSA. Tanenbaum just gave you all the evidence you need.
What are you talking about? The data used in the anonymous report is either the official data which anyone can download from Chicago elections website, or Enos' data, which is in his dataverse. The point is that they are different, and produce different results / conclusions. Are you that dense?
T
What are you talking about? The data used in the anonymous report is either the official data which anyone can download from Chicago elections website, or Enos' data, which is in his dataverse. The point is that they are different, and produce different results / conclusions. Are you that dense?
You're completely delusional, John.
There is nothing to the Enos claim, but the MPSA lawyer f-ed up very, very badly.
Chris, here is your career advice:
Drop Enos. You don't have the data from the anonymous memo and given that you didn't get it by now, I don't think you will ever get it.
Pursue MPSA. Tanenbaum just gave you all the evidence you need.
What are you talking about? The data used in the anonymous report is either the official data which anyone can download from Chicago elections website, or Enos' data, which is in his dataverse. The point is that they are different, and produce different results / conclusions. Are you that dense?
So it's our job to do your job?
Sounds about on brand.
Gregg Re is apparently giving Karl entire paragraphs to write... read the paragraph about Karl comparing all the law schools in D.C. metro as if he knows anything about them (from his home in Canada) and then insu1ting Jeffrey T. for going to a mid tier law school
obviously provided word-for-word by Gregg
Gregg Re is apparently giving Karl entire paragraphs to write... read the paragraph about Karl comparing all the law schools in D.C. metro as if he knows anything about them (from his home in Canada) and then insu1ting Jeffrey T. for going to a mid tier law school
obviously provided word-for-word by Gregg
And how ironic that Karl puts his name on such a "credentialist" rant. That must confuse his homo fanboys.
The best litigators are like super-troIls on steroids who know the law. Like a Karl, but with 10X the lQ and without his delusions. Pedigree doesn't matter a whole lot in that area of law.
And how ironic that Karl puts his name on such a "credentialist" rant. That must confuse his homo fanboys.
The best litigators are like super-troIls on steroids who know the law. Like a Karl, but with 10X the lQ and without his delusions. Pedigree doesn't matter a whole lot in that area of law.
lol well Gregg makes sure that Fox refers to Karl as "an economist and freelancer programmer" even though he's only done a 1-year "Masters" program and his freelancer profiles have zero work history.
I don't know ... I came into this thinking CB was going off the rails. But seeing the response to SU's completely valid complaint makes it hard to not want to see the AJPS and Harvard crowd go down in flames.
And this line from the email....
"Explain it to me slowly, like I'm an NYU Law grad who couldn't hack it in biglaw. Seriously."
really good stuff...reminds me of the old psjr...before the partisans of all stripes.
I don't know ... I came into this thinking CB was going off the rails. But seeing the response to SU's completely valid complaint makes it hard to not want to see the AJPS and Harvard crowd go down in flames.
And this line from the email....
"Explain it to me slowly, like I'm an NYU Law grad who couldn't hack it in biglaw. Seriously."
really good stuff...reminds me of the old psjr...before the partisans of all stripes.
This.
Karl, do you know the story of how KD and JL got to head AJPS in the first place? That should be a part of the story you pursue. First, total lack of due process for former editor amid #metoo allegation that was botched by MSU and MPSA. I don't know whether allegations were true or not, but started on Twitter and he was denied due process. Second, total lack of transparency on why the journal then went to KD and JL without competitive bid by an editorial team.
I don't know how they were selected but everyone knows Jacoby is a creep
He could have skated had he not sold those "Free Mustache Ride" shirts on the official AJPS site