Karl losing his marbles confirmed.
eff off
https://karlstack.substack.com/p/cease-and-desist-deez-nuts?s=w
Those SU emails with the editors...man...he does not like them lmao
I'm glad he exposed the strong pedigree b!as in editorial decisions, in addition to confirming that the Enos' irregularities are concerning and need to be investigated.
First, total lack of due process for former editor amid #metoo allegation that was botched by MSU and MPSA. I don't know whether allegations were true or not, but started on Twitter and he was denied due process.I don't know how they were selected but everyone knows Jacoby is a creep
“Everyone knows” your mother is a wh/ore.
We have thousand year traditions of due process, innocent until guilty and so on, painstakingly evolved through the spilling of blood, sweat and tears of millions.
Assimilate into this adult world. Or stay in the kitchen.
First, total lack of due process for former editor amid #metoo allegation that was botched by MSU and MPSA. I don't know whether allegations were true or not, but started on Twitter and he was denied due process.
I don't know how they were selected but everyone knows Jacoby is a creep
“Everyone knows” your mother is a wh/ore.
We have thousand year traditions of due process, innocent until guilty and so on, painstakingly evolved through the spilling of blood, sweat and tears of millions.
Assimilate into this adult world. Or stay in the kitchen.
https://www.poliscirumors.com/topic/today-is-the-807th-anniversary-of-the-signing-of-magna-carta
Best outcome is SU writes his own memo and submits it.
I'm almost tempted to look into it myself with how the editors talked to SU. It can't be that difficult to do.
and yet, you won't. Just like Karl didn't. Just like SU didn't. Etc.
All of them say "it's in the report!!" but none of them can actually do the work. We're all supposed to just "believe the anonymous report."
What if I told you there's a glaring mistake in the report? Here. I'm anonymous. Would you believe me?
Best outcome is SU writes his own memo and submits it.
I'm almost tempted to look into it myself with how the editors talked to SU. It can't be that difficult to do.and yet, you won't. Just like Karl didn't. Just like SU didn't. Etc.
All of them say "it's in the report!!" but none of them can actually do the work. We're all supposed to just "believe the anonymous report."
What if I told you there's a glaring mistake in the report? Here. I'm anonymous. Would you believe me?
The only thing in the report that matters is that there are more non-voters in the Enos data than in the official records. That doesn't require analysis and was the crux of SU's complaint.
The only thing in the report that matters is that there are more non-voters in the Enos data than in the official records. That doesn't require analysis and was the crux of SU's complaint.
Then should take anyone with an lQ above 90 about an hours worth of effort to do the required work.