Cute assumption that the decision about what goes on Russia Today-US, hosted by Tucker Carlsonski has anything to do with whether information has been confirmed as factual.
It’s going to be on Tucker Carlson unless we act.
Enos' refusal to correct results he knows are incorrect is research misconduct
-
I have broken three stories on Tucker. My blog/outlet has been mentioned by name each time.
Soon to be four?cut-and-pasting rumors form EJMR that get 10 seconds of attention from Tucker because of your homo relationship with Greg Re, is not “braking “ stories, ya dooshbag.
^ This
-
Karl/Chris, a post in good faith from somebody with no skin in the game. Rarely on this forum but you seem to be in the middle of a civil war and are taking some serious fire. This post strays into the realms of unsolicited advice but I hope you will take it as its intended.
1. Take some time and calmly consider the points in the Singal article from Mar 15. For the record, I think he was guilty of being too strident at one point and hypocritical at another moment. However, I think there are some very valid points and you would likely benefit by reflecting on them.
2. You are getting some traction on Fox it seems but I think you need to ask yourself at what cost? If they report your view as an expert it serves their purpose but its your reputation. You are an economist and so will be familiar with this dynamic.
3. Also, you will know a lot about path dependency. I am no expert but from the few threads I have browsed you have reacted to some of the more hot headed criticisms by doubling down and returning fire. This strategy should not be discounted. However, its not the only road available and working in journalism, equally, is not the only path.
I will jump on here once or twice over the next day or two if you want a dialogue.
-
Karl should not listen to anyone who treats Singal as a semi-serious person. Dude is a cr0k with a masters in philosophy and a sh4meless fraud apologist. He lost all credibility with his coverage of the Goffman case. With the article on Enos (2/3 of which was being angry he was sc0ped by a competitor) Singal delivered the final nail in his own c0\ffin.
-
Karl should not listen to anyone who treats Singal as a semi-serious person. Dude is a cr0k with a masters in philosophy and a sh4meless fraud apologist. He lost all credibility with his coverage of the Goffman case. With the article on Enos (2/3 of which was being angry he was sc0ped by a competitor) Singal delivered the final nail in his own c0\ffin.
Yeah, this is a fair take on Singal. I like him generally, but I can't disagree with any of the above.
-
You are an economist and so will be familiar with this dynamic.
Uh, Karl is not an "economist" by any definition.
He's an attention-seeking French Canadian MAGUH-Iarper who thinks he can somehow find a way to earn an income by shjtflooding the internet with poorly written tweets, posts, and blog articles about American culture war issues.
-
You are an economist and so will be familiar with this dynamic.
Uh, Karl is not an "economist" by any definition.
He's an attention-seeking French Canadian MAGUH-Iarper who thinks he can somehow find a way to earn an income by shjtflooding the internet with poorly written tweets, posts, and blog articles about American culture war issues.He has CFA + MFE. He is an economist.
-
He has CFA + MFE. He is an economist.
LOL. CFA? A masters degree? "credentials" don't make one an economist.
The work which one does daily, and the contributions that one makes to the discipline, are the only things that count. Being on welfare and squandering one's life as an internet troII do not count.
-
You have also made it explicitly clear that you are willing to investigating if someone
Lol nice proofreading.
Does having a PhD magically make someone better able to see these simple data errors?
No, though getting a phd in certain fields does train you to realize missing data can occur for multiple reasons.
-
You have also made it explicitly clear that you are willing to investigating if someone
Lol nice proofreading.Does having a PhD magically make someone better able to see these simple data errors?
No, though getting a phd in certain fields does train you to realize missing data can occur for multiple reasons.Can you name me a plausible reason for this missing data? Nobody has been able to provide one
-
Karl, if you're a capable economist, a serious person, and want to discredit RE and his paper, why not do the replication, write the critique, and submit it to AJPS? Why pedal something half-baked to Fox news so they can gin up people about the culture wars until they're running around with their hair on fire about some random prof at Harvard. I fail to see how that's constructive, unless your role is strictly a bomb-throwing culture warrior. I think Farley has some good life advice for you above: have some self-respect and do the hard work if you can.
-
Karl, if you're a capable economist, a serious person, and want to discredit RE and his paper, why not do the replication, write the critique, and submit it to AJPS? Why pedal something half-baked to Fox news so they can gin up people about the culture wars until they're running around with their hair on fire about some random prof at Harvard. I fail to see how that's constructive, unless your role is strictly a bomb-throwing culture warrior. I think Farley has some good life advice for you above: have some self-respect and do the hard work if you can.
There's already enough in/cri/minating evidence in the report, and the R code to replicate the findings on irregularities for those who understand the methods. It's not rocket science. Enos has failed to address one single claim in the report. Why should CB gift him another year of Harvard tenure and allow him to teach, advise, and do some more fraudulent research on taxpayers' money if he can be ruthlessly cut off right now? CB is providing enormous service to the academic community, which most tenured profs have been too co/ward/ly to provide. The sooner this gets on Fox News, the better.
-
Right, because Tucker Carlson so much credibility with folks at Harvard (and 2/3 of the US) that they on his every word. Academic community is reflexively resistant because TC (and pals) trade in nonsense and conspiracy theory. You want academics to pay attention? Submit a replication and reasoned rejoinder to AJPS.
-
Thanks Farley. Not really sure what dialogue means, but I appreciate your answer so I will answer your points.
1. He may have made some good points, but yes I don’t choose to emphasize those in my article. Why would I? His good points were mostly about me or my style; not about the facts or substance of this case. I know better than anyone what my own flaws are already. No point dwelling on them. Maybe I can work to fix them. Life is about being a better version of yourself than you were yesterday. I recognize that.
2. I don’t want Fox to parrot “my views as an expert” I simply want them to report the truth. I am irrelevant to the truth. If it just so happens that I have the truth on my side, and Harvard/AJPS do not, then so be it. I am totally apathetic to my reputation or to Fox News’ agenda. I simply want to disseminate the truth. That is what I value most. Truth.
3. This path dependency gets to bigger question of what I want to do with my life. You are right I certainly have locked myself out of certain paths, e.g it is unlikely I will get hired at MSNBC or Meta or Google. I am fine with the choices I have made, I chose my strategy knowing the consequences. I would like to do a PhD but sadly I burned that bridge a long time ago. You suggest there are other things to do with my life. I am not too worried about planning for the future. I am focused on the process rather the outcome. Whatever happens with my career, happens.
Karl/Chris, a post in good faith from somebody with no skin in the game. Rarely on this forum but you seem to be in the middle of a civil war and are taking some serious fire. This post strays into the realms of unsolicited advice but I hope you will take it as its intended.
1. Take some time and calmly consider the points in the Singal article from Mar 15. For the record, I think he was guilty of being too strident at one point and hypocritical at another moment. However, I think there are some very valid points and you would likely benefit by reflecting on them.
2. You are getting some traction on Fox it seems but I think you need to ask yourself at what cost? If they report your view as an expert it serves their purpose but its your reputation. You are an economist and so will be familiar with this dynamic.
3. Also, you will know a lot about path dependency. I am no expert but from the few threads I have browsed you have reacted to some of the more hot headed criticisms by doubling down and returning fire. This strategy should not be discounted. However, its not the only road available and working in journalism, equally, is not the only path.
I will jump on here once or twice over the next day or two if you want a dialogue. -
You have also made it explicitly clear that you are willing to investigating if someone
Lol nice proofreading.
Does having a PhD magically make someone better able to see these simple data errors?
No, though getting a phd in certain fields does train you to realize missing data can occur for multiple reasons.Can you name me a plausible reason for this missing data? Nobody has been able to provide one
Could the missing data be related to matching (e.g., he threw out any precincts in which there we no matches)?
-
“I am not too worried about planning for the future. I am focused on the process rather the outcome. Whatever happens with my career, happens.”
- CBEvery other dude I’ve ever heard say this really means by it: “my plan for financial security is waiting for my parents to pass away and leave me the house.”
-
You have also made it explicitly clear that you are willing to investigating if someone
Lol nice proofreading.
Does having a PhD magically make someone better able to see these simple data errors?
No, though getting a phd in certain fields does train you to realize missing data can occur for multiple reasons.
Can you name me a plausible reason for this missing data? Nobody has been able to provide oneCould the missing data be related to matching (e.g., he threw out any precincts in which there we no matches)?
Of course his explanation would be some version of this.
It was sufficiently satisfactory for reviewers and any other scholar who has thus far asked him about this.
Just a handful of deIusional bat-shjtters spazzing out about it because of Karl’s siIIy spewage.