Enos' refusal to correct results he knows are incorrect is research misconduct

10 months - 85 posts - Latest - RSS
OP: 6 Goods vs 19 No Goods
Thread: 274 Goods vs 258 No Goods

Political Science Rumors » Off Topic » Off Topic

Enos' refusal to correct results he knows are incorrect is research misconduct

12…5 Next »

Tifa

even if his data turned out to be the result of honest errors (which is unlikely).

It doesn't matter HOW he became aware of the data errors. What matters is that he is now fully aware that his dataset has hundreds of observations that are missing or different from official data, and that the missing observations are unfavorable to his pet theory.

The results in the AJPS article are NOT truthful and accurate to the best of his knowledge. He is obligated to publish a corrigendum. Failure to do so is research misconduct.

10 months ago # QUOTE 6 YEA 19 NAY !
ExogenyKarl
Rep: 4

So please email AJPS and ask them to investigate. They say they will investigate if someone puts their name to it. They just won’t accept my name.

10 months ago # QUOTE 5 YEA 22 NAY !
Peronel

So please email AJPS and ask them to investigate. They say they will investigate if someone puts their name to it. They just won’t accept my name.

How can they do that? Wtf

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 0 NAY !
Sharla

Tip

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 YEA 0 NAY !
Kourtney

So please email AJPS and ask them to investigate. They say they will investigate if someone puts their name to it. They just won’t accept my name.

I sent them a series of wildly unprofessional and unhinged emails and now they won't talk to me!

10 months ago # QUOTE 11 YEA 5 NAY !
ExogenyKarl
Rep: 4

So please email AJPS and ask them to investigate. They say they will investigate if someone puts their name to it. They just won’t accept my name.

I sent them a series of wildly unprofessional and unhinged emails and now they won't talk to me!

Do you think their emails were more professional and/or ethical than mine? I don’t. They are straight up lying about the reason they refuse to investigate. I find that unhinged.

I guess you value decorum more than the truth. Sad.

10 months ago # QUOTE 9 YEA 24 NAY !
Kerr

You lost , CB. Such an ineffectual takedown effort. And then you got dragged in public. Lolz.

10 months ago # QUOTE 14 YEA 5 NAY !
Carson

Yeah good God folks. If you all spent this much mental on your own work, you'd be much better off.

10 months ago # QUOTE 1 YEA 1 NAY !
Haylee

Email to the AJPS Board:

Dear AJPS Editorial Team,

You have made it clear you are unwilling to investigate Enos' results if the complaint comes from me. Never mind that it doesn't matter how you became aware of the data errors. What matters is that you are now fully aware that his dataset has hundreds of observations that are missing or different from official data, and that the missing observations are unfavorable to his pet theory. The results in the AJPS article are not truthful and accurate to the best of your knowledge.

You have also made it explicitly clear that you are willing to investigating if someone other than me puts their name to the allegations. Therefore would you be willing to accept a formal complaint from Gregg Re, cc'd, who is a producer at Fox News?

If no -- can you please outline under which conditions you would be willing to accept a complaint? Does having a PhD magically make someone better able to see these simple data errors? If so, I would be happy to find a professor to put their name to the complaint. Please let me know.

Thanks,
Christopher Brunet

10 months ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 0 NAY !
ExogenyKarl
Rep: 4

This email could’ve only been copy-pasted from someone on AJPS editorial board. I sent it to them this morning.

Congrats AJPS you now have an insider on your board posting your emails on PSR

Email to the AJPS Board:
Dear AJPS Editorial Team,
You have made it clear you are unwilling to investigate Enos' results if the complaint comes from me. Never mind that it doesn't matter how you became aware of the data errors. What matters is that you are now fully aware that his dataset has hundreds of observations that are missing or different from official data, and that the missing observations are unfavorable to his pet theory. The results in the AJPS article are not truthful and accurate to the best of your knowledge.
You have also made it explicitly clear that you are willing to investigating if someone other than me puts their name to the allegations. Therefore would you be willing to accept a formal complaint from Gregg Re, cc'd, who is a producer at Fox News?
If no -- can you please outline under which conditions you would be willing to accept a complaint? Does having a PhD magically make someone better able to see these simple data errors? If so, I would be happy to find a professor to put their name to the complaint. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Christopher Brunet

10 months ago # QUOTE 6 YEA 16 NAY !
Rexana

^ CB now just taking the full self-pwn route. Go out and touch some grass, son. Get your life in order.

10 months ago # QUOTE 14 YEA 3 NAY !
Peronel

Lolololol AJPS editorial board is leaking their own emails on PSR

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 1 NAY !
Laz

Lolololol AJPS editorial board is leaking their own emails on PSR

Dude, there’s a 100% chance that email was posted by Karl through a different IP address. He’s so clumsy at this.

10 months ago # QUOTE 12 YEA 3 NAY !
Frederica

Kathleen and Jennifer,

This has gone too far. Enough is enough. There are clearly credible grounds to investigate, and the reputational hit from doing so will be much less than the already great reputational hit from not do so. Please take action.

- Someone who receives the same email

10 months ago # QUOTE 5 YEA 2 NAY !
Rexana

Kathleen and Jennifer,
This has gone too far. Enough is enough. There are clearly credible grounds to investigate, and the reputational hit from doing so will be much less than the already great reputational hit from not do so. Please take action.
- Someone who receives the same email

Hahahahahaha. The "reputational hit" from the bros of PSR! All four of them! Employed at... well... nowhere!!

10 months ago # QUOTE 5 YEA 4 NAY !
Kourtney

So please email AJPS and ask them to investigate. They say they will investigate if someone puts their name to it. They just won’t accept my name.
I sent them a series of wildly unprofessional and unhinged emails and now they won't talk to me!

Do you think their emails were more professional and/or ethical than mine? I don’t. They are straight up lying about the reason they refuse to investigate. I find that unhinged.
I guess you value decorum more than the truth. Sad.

To answer your question: yes. I do think they were more professional and ethical. Thanks for the question.

10 months ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 3 NAY !
Frederica

Kathleen and Jennifer,
This has gone too far. Enough is enough. There are clearly credible grounds to investigate, and the reputational hit from doing so will be much less than the already great reputational hit from not do so. Please take action.
- Someone who receives the same email

Hahahahahaha. The "reputational hit" from the bros of PSR! All four of them! Employed at... well... nowhere!!

It’s going to be on Tucker Carlson unless we act.

10 months ago # QUOTE 4 YEA 0 NAY !
Rexana

Kathleen and Jennifer,
This has gone too far. Enough is enough. There are clearly credible grounds to investigate, and the reputational hit from doing so will be much less than the already great reputational hit from not do so. Please take action.
- Someone who receives the same email
Hahahahahaha. The "reputational hit" from the bros of PSR! All four of them! Employed at... well... nowhere!!

It’s going to be on Tucker Carlson unless we act.

Lol. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. *winks*

10 months ago # QUOTE 4 YEA 4 NAY !
Peronel

Kathleen and Jennifer,
This has gone too far. Enough is enough. There are clearly credible grounds to investigate, and the reputational hit from doing so will be much less than the already great reputational hit from not do so. Please take action.
- Someone who receives the same email
Hahahahahaha. The "reputational hit" from the bros of PSR! All four of them! Employed at... well... nowhere!!
It’s going to be on Tucker Carlson unless we act.

Lol. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. *winks*

Karl has broken multiple stories on Tucker before. I don’t know why you think this isn’t credible. That audience eats this stuff up: a professor at Harvard lying to make yt people seem raycist

10 months ago # QUOTE 3 YEA 2 NAY !
Rexana

Kathleen and Jennifer,
This has gone too far. Enough is enough. There are clearly credible grounds to investigate, and the reputational hit from doing so will be much less than the already great reputational hit from not do so. Please take action.
- Someone who receives the same email
Hahahahahaha. The "reputational hit" from the bros of PSR! All four of them! Employed at... well... nowhere!!
It’s going to be on Tucker Carlson unless we act.
Lol. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. *winks*

Karl has broken multiple stories on Tucker before. I don’t know why you think this isn’t credible. That audience eats this stuff up: a professor at Harvard lying to make yt people seem raycist

It isn't credible because it isn't credible. There are no signs whatsoever that it will be on the TuckShow. You know, outside the feverdreams of PSRBros.

10 months ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 2 NAY !

12…5 Next »

Enos' refusal to correct results he knows are incorrect is research misconduct

Reply »