Moooooommmmmmmyyyyyyy!
Guess who has tweeted 47 times today?
-
She can’t, no criticism allowed!!
KZ, ignore the trolls. This is starting to look like a meltdown, and that's not a good look.Haha haha, what criticism? There's just aggrieved wh!ning that some random scholar writes too many things and makes you sad. Get a safe space!
No KZ, don't say that. You're much more than a random scholar. We at W&M believe in you. You're so much more; a mentor, a role model.
And don't worry about not being able to defend against the criticism of hypocrisy. We get it. You don't need to address those criticism because you're creating a safe space. Never get tired, don't give up! We count on you!
-
She can’t, no criticism allowed!!
KZ, ignore the trolls. This is starting to look like a meltdown, and that's not a good look.
Haha haha, what criticism? There's just aggrieved wh!ning that some random scholar writes too many things and makes you sad. Get a safe space!No KZ, don't say that. You're much more than a random scholar. We at W&M believe in you. You're so much more; a mentor, a role model.
And don't worry about not being able to defend against the criticism of hypocrisy. We get it. You don't need to address those criticism because you're creating a safe space. Never get tired, don't give up! We count on you!What's your name? Don't be a cowhard and say it.
-
KZ defender is definitely not KZ. Just look at this comment:
"Nope. Not a single comment has a shred of substance. Not one. They're just wh!ning that a random person talks too much and they don't like their research for some reason. So triggered!"
This is classic C_G sentence structure. (Start with "nope", then sentence fragment about "substance", then "Not one." Add filler sentence. Then exclamatory conclusion). I've seen a version of this comment multiple times in other threads (and she will follow my post with "Aw white boy and his... imaginary friend" or self-reference as a "Harvard Dean.)
-
Good catches, maybe it’s not KZ. KZ’s tells are “My, my” and the modifier “utterly.” Also some British affectations from the motherland. And constantly reminding everyone she’s technically a millennial even though that isn’t the impression you’d get from looking at her
KZ defender is definitely not KZ. Just look at this comment:
"Nope. Not a single comment has a shred of substance. Not one. They're just wh!ning that a random person talks too much and they don't like their research for some reason. So triggered!"
This is classic C_G sentence structure. (Start with "nope", then sentence fragment about "substance", then "Not one." Add filler sentence. Then exclamatory conclusion). I've seen a version of this comment multiple times in other threads (and she will follow my post with "Aw white boy and his... imaginary friend" or self-reference as a "Harvard Dean.) -
She talks about it constantly herself, even wrote a blog post about good ole Uncle Edison Z. Combined with her religious upbringing it’s just not possible that this woman is a sincere progressive
Any proof? I ask out of curiosity.
She's wealthier than all the people she criticizes for their privilege. Ironic.
Yes. Some of us know her family history. -
Lorrie and Lorraine have an axe to grind, lmbo!
She talks about it constantly herself, even wrote a blog post about good ole Uncle Edison Z. Combined with her religious upbringing it’s just not possible that this woman is a sincere progressive
Any proof? I ask out of curiosity.
She's wealthier than all the people she criticizes for their privilege. Ironic.
Yes. Some of us know her family history. -
WM insider here -- it's already grown tiring. The College has tried to increase diversity, which most members of the Gov dept support, but the problem is that Williamsburg is a good place to live if you're a normie whitey or have a partner and fam and want to settle down, it's very hard if you are PoC who is young and single. That's why the PoC the College usually attracts are pretty second rate (if they attract any), but in this case it's worse cuz she is going to make the dept a toxic place even though it's full of progressives who would otherwise support her. Also, if you look at who they've hired recently, it's people with PhDs from top 10s -- she won't hang at dept seminars and probably grow more bitter and vocal.
-
she already feels disrespected by anyone that contradicts even innocuous statements she makes on twitter so I would guess this inferiority issue bubbles up professionally as degree envy toward people from T10? (‘maybe I would have gone to Princeton if my relatives actually ran Zim’)
WM insider here -- it's already grown tiring. The College has tried to increase diversity, which most members of the Gov dept support, but the problem is that Williamsburg is a good place to live if you're a normie whitey or have a partner and fam and want to settle down, it's very hard if you are PoC who is young and single. That's why the PoC the College usually attracts are pretty second rate (if they attract any), but in this case it's worse cuz she is going to make the dept a toxic place even though it's full of progressives who would otherwise support her. Also, if you look at who they've hired recently, it's people with PhDs from top 10s -- she won't hang at dept seminars and probably grow more bitter and vocal.