And who knows? Maybe you'll actually start to learn what the conservative tradition is actually about.
Since we've already proven you cannot read for content and cannot conduct research, I'm sure you know precisely diddley-squat about "the conservative tradition" - which, incidentally, is not under debate in this thread.
So you're not willing to understand either a) the study you keep referring to, or b) the conservative tradition? Got it. Symptomatic of our times, I guess.
Unfortunately for OP, god don’t get a vote. The American public does. And they’re bringing you a whole lotta Dems this term.
Voting is the liturgy of moral relativism. Under God's objective moral law, right and wrong are known. We do not require a show of hands to determine the right course of action. The exercise of power is not arbitrary oppression, it is authority when it complies with the law of God.
Gord, you're the type of atheist pseu-0dointellectual who confuses pathos with logos.
Enlighten me.
Many religions claim theirs is the one true religion and all others are lies.
Based on evidence, which one is correct, and why?
You posted a strawman argument. But you thought it was a real clincher because it sounded cool.
Gord, you're the type of atheist pseu-0dointellectual who confuses pathos with logos.
Enlighten me.
Many religions claim theirs is the one true religion and all others are lies.
Based on evidence, which one is correct, and why?You posted a strawman argument. But you thought it was a real clincher because it sounded cool.
You said "The exercise of power is not arbitrary oppression, it is authority when it complies with the law of God."
I'm merely asking "which God"?
Unless your claim is that all Gods promote the same "law"?