The model also lets you trace chains of cause and effect to explain why that answer arises
Insert "pretend to" between the words "you" and "trace" and you'd have an accurate claim here.All models are wrong. Some are useful.
Deal with it.
I'm sorry the discipline has moved on from your favorite gimmick; I can see how that would be difficult for you.
Why would the study of politics need a systematic way of understanding strategic interaction? I just don't see the connection.
~ 95% of political scientists
The other 5% don't have their head entirely up their own a$$.
Machine learning can do a lot of what the game theorists do...
Why would the study of politics need a systematic way of understanding strategic interaction? I just don't see the connection.
~ 95% of political scientists
The other 5% don't have their head entirely up their own a$$.Machine learning can do a lot of what the game theorists do...
Actually, it can't do any of what game theory does.
Why would the study of politics need a systematic way of understanding strategic interaction? I just don't see the connection.
~ 95% of political scientists
The other 5% don't have their head entirely up their own a$$.Machine learning can do a lot of what the game theorists do...
machine learning in poli sci is pretty much over. people dont know how to take advantage of it properly. nothing more than copy/paste stackoverflow.