Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.
The righties on here are non-academics and washed out non-academics. You have to leave a lot of breadcrumbs or else they get lost and confused.
Yeah, that's right: a member of a profession that spends significant time on issues of attribution and crediting appropriate sources is "a non-academic" that gets "lost and confused."
You dvmbfvkc.
My apologies. So are we using APA or Chicago style in our citations now on PSR? Because again, I thought I could leave it up to you to google search if you wanted to look up details of something that you saw on an anonymous internet message board.
Next time I'll be sure to thoroughly attribute any and all claims I make here. Because I'd hate to have a distinguished man of letters like yourself call me a "dvmbfvkc" again.