Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene laughed off a question about young people dying of Covid-19, telling the reporter, “You crack me up.” The reporter was trying to ask MTG about the death of a 5 year old... in MTG's district.
Parents love when their representatives laugh at the deaths of their children.
Yeah, I'm completely certain this isn't some half-@s$3d media smear campaign brought to you by the same people who roll over and wet themselves when Psaki offers them cookies.
I, for one, am impressed by all the thought and research that Goldie put into this nuanced, sensitive post. Truly the best that PSR has to offer!
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Yeah, I'm completely certain this isn't some half-@s$3d media smear campaign brought to you by the same people who roll over and wet themselves when Psaki offers them cookies.
I, for one, am impressed by all the thought and research that Goldie put into this nuanced, sensitive post. Truly the best that PSR has to offer!
More than OP put into his, I guarantee you that.
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
I just found it with approximately 1.3 seconds of searching. Do you not know how to search for current political events?
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.
The righties on here are non-academics and washed out non-academics. You have to leave a lot of breadcrumbs or else they get lost and confused.
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.
Sources don't matter to you. Got it.
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.The righties on here are non-academics and washed out non-academics. You have to leave a lot of breadcrumbs or else they get lost and confused.
Yeah, that's right: a member of a profession that spends significant time on issues of attribution and crediting appropriate sources is "a non-academic" that gets "lost and confused."
You dvmbfvkc.
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.Sources don't matter to you. Got it.
Notice how quickly Goldie has gone scurrying away from his original efforts to cast doubt on the veracity of the quote from MTG -- the one where she laughs about the death of a 5 year-old in her district.
I guess he now recognizes that she acted in this repugnant manner.
Notice how quickly Goldie has gone scurrying away from his original efforts to cast doubt on the veracity of the quote from MTG -- the one where she laughs about the death of a 5 year-old in her district.
I guess he now recognizes that she acted in this repugnant manner.
What's repugnant is playing on the anomalous death of a child to score political points.
Goldie knows it is a variety of ad hominem fallacy, but it works for him so he is sticking with it. It prevents any nasty bouts of cognitive dissonance from ever cropping up.
This from the OP who made a very nasty accusation in his original post, sans context or attribution.
Goldie, sorry I didn't include a citation down in the references section of this thread. I just assumed you had a Google machine and would be able to find things all by yourself.
The righties on here are non-academics and washed out non-academics. You have to leave a lot of breadcrumbs or else they get lost and confused.Yeah, that's right: a member of a profession that spends significant time on issues of attribution and crediting appropriate sources is "a non-academic" that gets "lost and confused."
You dvmbfvkc.
My apologies. So are we using APA or Chicago style in our citations now on PSR? Because again, I thought I could leave it up to you to google search if you wanted to look up details of something that you saw on an anonymous internet message board.
Next time I'll be sure to thoroughly attribute any and all claims I make here. Because I'd hate to have a distinguished man of letters like yourself call me a "dvmbfvkc" again.