ik the list is no CHAMPS or whatever it is :/ so I'm fully expecting to be destroyed on here, but of the 4 which do u think has a better placement record?
Ohio State v UT Austin v UNC v Northwestern for CP/IPE
-
ut austin
big dept, tons of resources.No way. Big department. Students get lost in it. No record of consistent placement. What even is a UT student?
UNC has some very smart people with a history of placements. Better methods training. And the socialization experience there will get you where you need to be.
-
ut austin
big dept, tons of resources.No way. Big department. Students get lost in it. No record of consistent placement. What even is a UT student?
UNC has some very smart people with a history of placements. Better methods training. And the socialization experience there will get you where you need to be.UT actually has had pretty solid placements in recent years.
-
ut austin
big dept, tons of resources.No way. Big department. Students get lost in it. No record of consistent placement. What even is a UT student?
UNC has some very smart people with a history of placements. Better methods training. And the socialization experience there will get you where you need to be.Depends if you're more on the CPE or IPE side... UT has a lot of IR faculty and relatively few IR students... a committee of Jensen, Wellhausen, Nielsen, Findley would be pretty strong
I have no idea why there's still this common conception that UNC is a strong phd program. Look at the placement report they have on their website from last year. Of the 298 students who entered the program since 1999: 61 have TT jobs, 77 left without phd, 49 still enrolled, remainder are non-TT or non-academic. IR numbers are even worse.