you people are disgusting. when did it become OK to trash a junior scholar like this. you should be ashamed. oh, i forgot, you have no souls.
You must be new here. Nearly every market star gets trashed on this forum.
SP (Harvard -> Oxford -> Stanford) still hasn't published a paper
-
The teaching materials at her website were 100% created by previous Harvard teaching fellows. A lot of work to redesign those materials was done by a white guy who didn't pursue an academic carer and works as a data scientist at a big company. She basically just added her name. She does give them credit in two sets of slides, but for most of the slides no credit is given. It's ok to reuse someone else's teaching materials in class, with their permission, as long as you give them due credit. It's NOT kosher to upload them at your website as "your" teaching materials if you didn't prepare them yourself, and certainly not without any credit given. You are intentionally misleading search committees regarding your abilities to prepare teaching materials.
-
9 years now.
two years? That's too short to produce a great work, unless you free ride.
Seriously? Someone who spent 6 years in grad school and 2 years in a postdoc hasn't "had time" to produce anything in the past 8 years?
Despite having no teaching obligations?
Despite having virtually unlimited resources relative to their peers in programs ranked below the top 10?
Despite having summers free to pursue their research instead of having to teach summer school or find outside employment to make ends meet?
Despite the major advantage of having Harvard/Oxford as their institutional affiliations during the review process, had they chosen to submit any work?
Despite being among the best-connected network of renowned scholars for 8 years?
Why are so many CHYMPS people are so f***ing lazy? Everyone else is expected to publish several pieces as an ABD as a minimum requirement for the long list at a bottom-feeder R1, and yet many of those who meet that requirement will apply everywhere and still be unemployed.
So I guess the question is this: What do you people even do all day? -
Thought she’d have done the same things with articles by now
The teaching materials at her website were 100% created by previous Harvard teaching fellows. A lot of work to redesign those materials was done by a white guy who didn't pursue an academic carer and works as a data scientist at a big company. She basically just added her name. She does give them credit in two sets of slides, but for most of the slides no credit is given. It's ok to reuse someone else's teaching materials in class, with their permission, as long as you give them due credit. It's NOT kosher to upload them at your website as "your" teaching materials if you didn't prepare them yourself, and certainly not without any credit given. You are intentionally misleading search committees regarding your abilities to prepare teaching materials.
-
I think this is partly a case of a young scholar afraid of submitting a paper for review, simply because it's not absolutely perfect and anything short of APSR is considered a "failure." Those papers could have been published somewhere. Better to get them published somewhere than nowhere at all.
-
Just lol
I think this is partly a case of a young scholar afraid of submitting a paper for review, simply because it's not absolutely perfect and anything short of APSR is considered a "failure." Those papers could have been published somewhere. Better to get them published somewhere than nowhere at all.
-
She’s on track. Progress on the cv is discontinuous.
She will get a CUP contract. And with the JOP, all she needs is another top 3 and to publish the rest of those working papers in any subfield journal. And that’s tenure folks.The JOP is not going to count towards tenure at a place like Stanford. It was published nearly 5 years before she got there, and is coauthored with a senior scholar.
-
The JOP is not going to count towards tenure at a place like Stanford. It was published nearly 5 years before she got there, and is coauthored with a senior scholar.
It depends on whether her colleagues like her and whether they still feel pressures to diversify the tenure pool.