The premise of the film is that the 1950s were a place of dreary conformism and seksual repression. The 1950s scenes are shot in black and white, and then the colors enter the frame literally once the people start masstehbayting and having seks out of wedlock. The messaging of the movie is so on-the-nose. It wants to celebrate the social changes of the 1960s without tackling the nightmarish consequences of people abandoning the Lord's statutes on masse. It's a perfect representation of how Hollywood gre##seballs like Rob Reiner see reality.
Not a movie, but mentioning this is mandatory. A romanticized revision and revisionist romanticization of the Clinton administration.
If you want to understand the psychology of liberalism and the democratic party, you have to study this series.
No sympathetic devout Christian characters in the series (written by liberal New Yorker Aaron Sorkin). The fantasy president Josiah Bartlet is an economics professor who won the Nobel (liberals are insecure about their lack of intellectual rigor when it comes to economics).
The show glamorizes the lives of sterile beta male career bureaucrats who don't have families. C.J. Cregg, White House Press Secretary, recapitulates the false and naive political philosophy of liberalism stating that "government is a place of hope; a place where people can come together". In other words, government is the liberal's substitute for religion, which is why they have such unrealistic expectations about what policy can achieve; why they believe they'd create the kingdom of heaven on earth if it weren't for those annoying Republicans, and why they treat the act of voting like one is communing with the Lord inside the poll booth.
The story of the AIDS plague of the 1980s is about ghey men throwing their lives away through dangerous and irresponsible seksual activity. But that's no good because liberals think there is nothing odd or dangerous about ghey seks. So Hollywood created "Philadelphia" where the narrative is reframed so that we feel sympathetic for the ghey AIDS patient as a victim of society's bigotry.
The moral of the story is not that ghey men should take responsibility for their bad habits and embrace celibacy. No. The moral of the story is that we can all build up the antibodies necessary to defeat the virus of homophobia.
New York liberal screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is a slippery weasel who can't comprehend the masculine culture of the military because he's a p__uss)y. So he comes up with story where a marine colonel is conquered by a lawyer. This is a nerd revenge fantasy created by a beta male who can't comprehend the absolute need for discipline in the military. (Most fatalities among active duty infantrymen are from friendly fire incidents, not the enemy's bullets.) So somehow Colonel Jessup is a monster for ordering the code red. If you tried to explain this movie to a WWII veteran, they wouldn't get it.
A drama about a boy working in an abortion clinic. The film promulgates liberal lies used to justify legalized abortion. The mothers are portrayed as the victims, not the murdered babies. The story tries to cement the notion that abortion clinics save lives by preventing women from seeing the mythical alleyway clothes hanger specialist.
A film about the life of San Francisco councilman and gay rights activist, Harvey Milk, played by Sean Penn. Penn is a highly rigorous method actor, so I shudder to think about what he did to prepare for the role and what he was doing between takes.
'Milk' promotes the liberal lie that homoahseksuals deserve special rights to grant their relationships and lifestyle equal footing with normal people's when they already are tolerated as long as they keep their activities behind closed doors. The film is a celebration of Milk's achievements in the sphere of LGBT rights and conveniently glosses over the seedier aspects of Harvey Milk's seksual appetite. 'Milk' serves to brainwash another generation of young people with the liberal lie that gheys can only be victims or martyrs.
THE WEST WING
Not a movie, but mentioning this is mandatory. A romanticized revision and revisionist romanticization of the Clinton administration.
If you want to understand the psychology of liberalism and the democratic party, you have to study this series.
No sympathetic devout Christian characters in the series (written by liberal New Yorker Aaron Sorkin). The fantasy president Josiah Bartlet is an economics professor who won the Nobel (liberals are insecure about their lack of intellectual rigor when it comes to economics).
The show glamorizes the lives of sterile beta male career bureaucrats who don't have families. C.J. Cregg, White House Press Secretary, recapitulates the false and naive political philosophy of liberalism stating that "government is a place of hope; a place where people can come together". In other words, government is the liberal's substitute for religion, which is why they have such unrealistic expectations about what policy can achieve; why they believe they'd create the kingdom of heaven on earth if it weren't for those annoying Republicans, and why they treat the act of voting like one is communing with the Lord inside the poll booth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g868M-27qpI
You're right about this one. It really does capture the loony Left. I am not myself religious, but that does not prevent me from seeing value in the culture Christianity has produced.
Aaron Sorkin is not your friend, I can tell. His political stuff is preachy and sanctimonious in the extreme, I agree. The Newsroom was unwatchable for that reason.
Another in a long line of Hollywood movies created to reify the myth that McCarthy and the HUAC perpetrated a great injustice against the far-left writers of Hollywood.
The Cold War was a struggle between the West and the East for global domination that had the potential of leading to global nuclear annihilation at any time. The purpose of Trumbo and films like it (such as George Clooney's snorefest "Good Night, and Good Luck") is to leverage what Bishop Fulton Sheen called 'false compassion'. The audience is being manipulated into sympathizing with the malefactor. Communism isn't the threat, it's the American government trying to prevent a communist revolution from taking place. By tolerating communist revolutionaries who are working to destroy the American republic and its way of life, we're actually saving it. Makes sense? No? Well, George Clooney gets it.
A FEW GOOD MEN (1992)
New York liberal screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is a slippery weasel who can't comprehend the masculine culture of the military because he's a p__uss)y. So he comes up with story where a marine colonel is conquered by a lawyer. This is a nerd revenge fantasy created by a beta male who can't comprehend the absolute need for discipline in the military. (Most fatalities among active duty infantrymen are from friendly fire incidents, not the enemy's bullets.) So somehow Colonel Jessup is a monster for ordering the code red. If you tried to explain this movie to a WWII veteran, they wouldn't get it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyMggFe9WRQ
You sound like a war criminal in training. But there's a reason war crimes are bad and so is "absolute disicpline"