Terrie
Remember, economists have physics envy and political scientists have econ envy. This.
Do historians have poli sci envy then?
Terrance
Yikes. Certainly not. I hate to break it to you, but nobody has poli sci envy.
Remember, economists have physics envy and political scientists have econ envy. This. Do historians have poli sci envy then?
Perceval
seriously delusional political scientists here
Post <blockquote>Cherilyn: It's worth noting that if you're at a CHYMPS polisci program, you can get just as good (if not a broader, better) theory-rigorous methodological training than at a "solid" econ school. Trust me, taking methods courses with Walter Mebane or Gary King is quite rigorous. Also, you should consider whether or not your CHYMPS school allows/encourages you to take courses outside of the department. Places like Harvard are known to "silo" more than a place like Michigan, which actually requires students to take a few courses outside of the department. You could not be more wrong. Seriously, you pretty much got nothing right.</blockquote>
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li