Jerry
Depends how you feel about being fisted, I suppose.
Shyla
LSE is the worst. Senior men just hiring attractive women, hoping to sleep with them. At least, they're hiring women. Name some attractive LSE fellows.
LSE is the worst. Senior men just hiring attractive women, hoping to sleep with them. At least, they're hiring women.
Name some attractive LSE fellows.
ME is sweet, both SH and CB are not bad-looking in their age.
Willard
LSE is the worst. Senior men just hiring attractive women, hoping to sleep with them. At least, they're hiring women. Name some attractive LSE fellows. ME is sweet, both SH and CB are not bad-looking in their age.
links?
Mattie
To be fair LSE does make an effort where placement is concerned.
Ignore the Oxford troll, this has been going on for two years. AE is excellent, well-liked, and overall a tremendous addition to DPIR.
He does seem very good.
Post You sound like trump. LSE is like Columbia or NYU - a university in a big city. This has pros and cons. And no, LSE is no more in the media than Oxbridge is. If anything, suicides are associated with Oxbridge rather than LSE. On the money making, LSE is a public university, just like all others in the UK. Fees are caped. It only got this reputation because of the amount of international students doing a master degree there, which does not offer the same level of engagement that an undergrad or a PhD. But a master at LSE is no different than at Oxbridge. And, in my personal opinion, teaching at LSE is usually better because they actually care about what students think. - Someone who actually studied at Oxbridge AND LSE. LSE is routinely in the British media for how crap it is towards students. It's a moneymaking operation, pure and simple, and couldn't give a damn about anything else. None of the academic staff live anywhere near the place and the corridors are like a ghost town. The students all live miles away, barricaded into their slum housing in Hackney or Croydon while gangs of Somalis and Congolese fight it out outside or stand around the corners waiting to rob and stab anyone passing. And then you've George Lawson to contend with... LSE? No thanks.
You sound like trump. LSE is like Columbia or NYU - a university in a big city. This has pros and cons. And no, LSE is no more in the media than Oxbridge is. If anything, suicides are associated with Oxbridge rather than LSE. On the money making, LSE is a public university, just like all others in the UK. Fees are caped. It only got this reputation because of the amount of international students doing a master degree there, which does not offer the same level of engagement that an undergrad or a PhD. But a master at LSE is no different than at Oxbridge. And, in my personal opinion, teaching at LSE is usually better because they actually care about what students think. - Someone who actually studied at Oxbridge AND LSE. LSE is routinely in the British media for how crap it is towards students. It's a moneymaking operation, pure and simple, and couldn't give a damn about anything else. None of the academic staff live anywhere near the place and the corridors are like a ghost town. The students all live miles away, barricaded into their slum housing in Hackney or Croydon while gangs of Somalis and Congolese fight it out outside or stand around the corners waiting to rob and stab anyone passing. And then you've George Lawson to contend with... LSE? No thanks.
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li