Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
What dreamworld do you live in?
was* due in large part to federalism. It’s a different world now where we occasionally need stronger central authority.
The success of the United States compared to other Western countries is due in large part to its federalist system that afford a degree of autonomy to states. This should be expanded, and secession is one way to do that.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
What dreamworld do you live in?
The one where Biden "won" the fewest counties in American history. Democrats are geographically concentrated, and as we saw last summer, manage their $h!tt!e$ poorly.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.
You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.
Because as we know, blue $h!tt!e$ are completely safe and not lawless ash-heaps.
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/08/cnn-fire-640x335.jpg
And totally imbued with patriotic love for their country!
https://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/parry-1-BLM1.png
https://wrhaystack.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/American-flag-burning.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/05/00/30399774-8490715-image-a-8_1593906776032.jpg
Some fun facts about Alabama, a state that last voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in 1976.
Alabama is the third-biggest overall taker of federal money, to the tune of $33B/year.
Alabama has the third-worst infant mortality in the country.
Alabama has the sixth-worst maternal mortality in the country.
Alabama has the fifth-worst educational attainment by high school degree and sixth-worst educational attainment by BA.
Alabama is in the bottom third of states for literacy rate.
Alabama ranks 46th in per-capita income.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.
You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.
And don't forget that Atlanta/Miami/Orland/New Orleans/etc. would likely revolt against an overbearing religiously fundamentalist southern nation.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.
You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.Because as we know, blue $h!tt!e$ are completely safe and not lawless ash-heaps.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/11/20/03/29027326-8967553-Chicago_A_Chicago_police_vehicle_is_set_on_fire_during_violent_p-a-11_1605841571068.jpg
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/08/cnn-fire-640x335.jpg
And totally imbued with patriotic love for their country!
https://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/parry-1-BLM1.png
https://wrhaystack.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/American-flag-burning.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/05/00/30399774-8490715-image-a-8_1593906776032.jpg
I would bet that most of the people you are arguing with live in those cities and would rather drink hot lead than move to your rural "paradise".
Some fun facts about California, a state that last voted for the Republican presidential candidate in 1988.
California is the recipient of the largest amount of federal funding: $43.61 billion / year in 2021.
California has the worst educational attainment by high school degree of any state (only 83%).
California has the worst literacy rate in the nation, at 76.9%, just ahead of New York at 77.9%.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.
You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.
Because as we know, blue $h!tt!e$ are completely safe and not lawless ash-heaps.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/11/20/03/29027326-8967553-Chicago_A_Chicago_police_vehicle_is_set_on_fire_during_violent_p-a-11_1605841571068.jpg
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/08/cnn-fire-640x335.jpg
And totally imbued with patriotic love for their country!
https://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/parry-1-BLM1.png
https://wrhaystack.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/American-flag-burning.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/05/00/30399774-8490715-image-a-8_1593906776032.jpgI would bet that most of the people you are arguing with live in those cities and would rather drink hot lead than move to your rural "paradise".
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.
You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.
Because as we know, blue $h!tt!e$ are completely safe and not lawless ash-heaps.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/11/20/03/29027326-8967553-Chicago_A_Chicago_police_vehicle_is_set_on_fire_during_violent_p-a-11_1605841571068.jpg
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/08/cnn-fire-640x335.jpg
And totally imbued with patriotic love for their country!
https://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/parry-1-BLM1.png
https://wrhaystack.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/American-flag-burning.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/05/00/30399774-8490715-image-a-8_1593906776032.jpg
I would bet that most of the people you are arguing with live in those cities and would rather drink hot lead than move to your rural "paradise".They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
To other cities! TA-DA
Please go.
It'd be great TV to watch the South collapse into an urban-rural civil war amongst itself.
You do realize that it would take a majority of US states with it, right? Leaving a small bunch of indefensible little blue islands, most of which have already collapsed.
Nah. A huge chunk of the educated, productive populace would emigrate to the non-trai/torous regions, leaving the new confederates to the impoverished Third World nation within a nation of their own making.
Because as we know, blue $h!tt!e$ are completely safe and not lawless ash-heaps.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/11/20/03/29027326-8967553-Chicago_A_Chicago_police_vehicle_is_set_on_fire_during_violent_p-a-11_1605841571068.jpg
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/08/cnn-fire-640x335.jpg
And totally imbued with patriotic love for their country!
https://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/parry-1-BLM1.png
https://wrhaystack.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/American-flag-burning.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/05/00/30399774-8490715-image-a-8_1593906776032.jpg
I would bet that most of the people you are arguing with live in those cities and would rather drink hot lead than move to your rural "paradise".
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.To other cities! TA-DA
Actually, some are moving to other cities. Some to the peripheries of their current $h!tt!e$ (and beyond). And some have abandoned cities altogether.
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
Also, you should probably know that an inability to converse without using hyper-partisan slang like "$h!tt!e$" will immediately discredit your opinion in the eyes of everyone you converse with who is not also already a hyper-copartisan.
So basically, if you actually want to influence opinions, maybe write like a grown up.
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
Also, you should probably know that an inability to converse without using hyper-partisan slang like "$h!tt!e$" will immediately discredit your opinion in the eyes of everyone you converse with who is not also already a hyper-copartisan.
So basically, if you actually want to influence opinions, maybe write like a grown up.
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
Also, you should probably know that an inability to converse without using hyper-partisan slang like "$h!tt!e$" will immediately discredit your opinion in the eyes of everyone you converse with who is not also already a hyper-copartisan.
So basically, if you actually want to influence opinions, maybe write like a grown up.It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Dude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
Also, you should probably know that an inability to converse without using hyper-partisan slang like "$h!tt!e$" will immediately discredit your opinion in the eyes of everyone you converse with who is not also already a hyper-copartisan.
So basically, if you actually want to influence opinions, maybe write like a grown up.It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Not good at accepting constructive criticism are you?
They are moving out of these $h!tt!e$, citing crime and environment.
Also, you should probably know that an inability to converse without using hyper-partisan slang like "$h!tt!e$" will immediately discredit your opinion in the eyes of everyone you converse with who is not also already a hyper-copartisan.
So basically, if you actually want to influence opinions, maybe write like a grown up.
If you want to influence someone's opinion, perhaps trying to insult them with every sentence is a remarkably poor tactic.
If you want to be treated like a grown-up, start acting like one yourself.
