I like the idea of a country where blahks are subservient, gehys out of sight and women dressed attractively.
Two in three Republicans in the South support SECEDING from the US
-
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Dude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
-
If you want to influence someone's opinion, perhaps trying to insult them with every sentence is a remarkably poor tactic.
If you want to be treated like a grown-up, start acting like one yourself.I don't particularly care to influence your opinion. Your choice of language has already signaled clearly that you are a hard-boiled ideologue, and we well know there is no point to holding discussion with hard-boiled ideologues. I'm merely offering a lesson in rhetoric, admittedly with some tough love thrown in.
It's your choice what to do with that.
Also, I'm sick of trying to parse what the heck people are trying to say when they have to type in wingdings to get around the filter. So, you know, maybe talk like an adult instead.
-
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Dude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
If you want to talk about perceived urban governance failure, then do so. Like an adult that respects their interlocutors. If you want to describe this phenomenon through scatological references, designed to mock and degrade these localities to score partisan points, then yes. It's pretty obviously hyper-partisan slang.
-
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
I think you'll find the answer if you try to explain to yourself why you use the term $h!tt!e$ instead of plain English like "Blue city".
Think hard. Why a neologism instead of plain English? Does it help you reach a broader audience? Contribute to conceptual clarity (is Moscow a $h!tt1e? Calcutta? Berlin? Riyadh? Tehran? How do you define this term? We have to know that before we can even discuss conceptual clarity)?
-
Recipient of largest amount of funding because BY FAR the largest state. Not a NET beneficiary though. California puts in a lot of taxes. West Virginia and Alabama not so much. It's a knowledge economy and Alabama and West Virginia are mostly not part of it.
Some fun facts about California, a state that last voted for the Republican presidential candidate in 1988.
California is the recipient of the largest amount of federal funding: $43.61 billion / year in 2021.
California has the worst educational attainment by high school degree of any state (only 83%).
California has the worst literacy rate in the nation, at 76.9%, just ahead of New York at 77.9%. -
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.phpDude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
If you want to talk about perceived urban governance failure, then do so. Like an adult that respects their interlocutors. If you want to describe this phenomenon through scatological references, designed to mock and degrade these localities to score partisan points, then yes. It's pretty obviously hyper-partisan slang.
This is what you wrote on the last page:
He must think he's still posting on one of his strange prepper/catastrophist chat rooms, where he goes to swap SHTF fantasies with his fellow rightbros.
And you want to accuse me of using "hyper-partisan slang." It is to laugh.
-
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Dude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
If you want to talk about perceived urban governance failure, then do so. Like an adult that respects their interlocutors. If you want to describe this phenomenon through scatological references, designed to mock and degrade these localities to score partisan points, then yes. It's pretty obviously hyper-partisan slang.This is what you wrote on the last page:
He must think he's still posting on one of his strange prepper/catastrophist chat rooms, where he goes to swap SHTF fantasies with his fellow rightbros.
And you want to accuse me of using "hyper-partisan slang." It is to laugh.
What I typed has no meaningful relationship to your usage of hyper-partisan slang. You understand this, yes?
-
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Dude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
If you want to talk about perceived urban governance failure, then do so. Like an adult that respects their interlocutors. If you want to describe this phenomenon through scatological references, designed to mock and degrade these localities to score partisan points, then yes. It's pretty obviously hyper-partisan slang.This is what you wrote on the last page:
He must think he's still posting on one of his strange prepper/catastrophist chat rooms, where he goes to swap SHTF fantasies with his fellow rightbros.
And you want to accuse me of using "hyper-partisan slang." It is to laugh.
So no defense then, Jeffrey?
I wouldn't be so concerned with others if I were you. You seem to have an ideological axe to grind. You would be better off learning how to discuss without discrediting yourself, assuming you are actually interested in influence.
-
To the best of my knowledge, I don't know who Beau is.
We probably just have similar office-hour schedules. (I basically only drop in here when no students who up to office hours.)Office hours mid July?
We get additional pay for taking on summer classes.
(Not much, mind you. But given covid, I didn't have summer plans anyway.) -
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
I think you'll find the answer if you try to explain to yourself why you use the term $h!tt!e$ instead of plain English like "Blue city".
Think hard. Why a neologism instead of plain English? Does it help you reach a broader audience? Contribute to conceptual clarity (is Moscow a $h!tt1e? Calcutta? Berlin? Riyadh? Tehran? How do you define this term? We have to know that before we can even discuss conceptual clarity)?My previous post, repeated for your failing comprehension:
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
-
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
I think you'll find the answer if you try to explain to yourself why you use the term $h!tt!e$ instead of plain English like "Blue city".
Think hard. Why a neologism instead of plain English? Does it help you reach a broader audience? Contribute to conceptual clarity (is Moscow a $h!tt1e? Calcutta? Berlin? Riyadh? Tehran? How do you define this term? We have to know that before we can even discuss conceptual clarity)?My previous post, repeated for your failing comprehension:
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
-
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.phpDude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
If you want to talk about perceived urban governance failure, then do so. Like an adult that respects their interlocutors. If you want to describe this phenomenon through scatological references, designed to mock and degrade these localities to score partisan points, then yes. It's pretty obviously hyper-partisan slang.
This is what you wrote on the last page:
He must think he's still posting on one of his strange prepper/catastrophist chat rooms, where he goes to swap SHTF fantasies with his fellow rightbros.
And you want to accuse me of using "hyper-partisan slang." It is to laugh.What I typed has no meaningful relationship to your usage of hyper-partisan slang. You understand this, yes?
I understand you used hyper-partisan slang, while blaming me for using a term that is based on actual conditions reported by residents of these areas.
Hypocrite much?
-
It isn't "hyper-partisan slang." It is a word that accurately reflects the problems and precipitously declining quality-of-life in certain cities - and acknowledges problems that the residents themselves complain about:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/feces-on-san-francisco-sidewalks-appears-to-be-getting-worse-report-says
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-human-waste-feces-homeless-Reddit-13044317.php
Dude, it's obvious hyper-partisan slang. That's why nobody takes you seriously here.
Please explain how commenting on obvious urban governance failure is "hyper-partisan slang."
If you want to talk about perceived urban governance failure, then do so. Like an adult that respects their interlocutors. If you want to describe this phenomenon through scatological references, designed to mock and degrade these localities to score partisan points, then yes. It's pretty obviously hyper-partisan slang.
This is what you wrote on the last page:
He must think he's still posting on one of his strange prepper/catastrophist chat rooms, where he goes to swap SHTF fantasies with his fellow rightbros.
And you want to accuse me of using "hyper-partisan slang." It is to laugh.
What I typed has no meaningful relationship to your usage of hyper-partisan slang. You understand this, yes?I understand you used hyper-partisan slang, while blaming me for using a term that is based on actual conditions reported by residents of these areas.
Hypocrite much?Perhaps I am a hypocrite. One cannot discount this possibility. That said, my own personality flaws have no bearing on your clear usage of hyper-partisan slang.