https://karlstack.substack.com/p/update-on-ajps-harvard-corruption?s=w
Update on AJPS / Harvard Corruption (Karlstack)
-
wait so SU actually did this? If so I'm shocked and impressed.
Impressed?
I thought he was going to do an actual independent and valid analysis himself with the data. If he had based a complaint on THAT, it would have meant something.
It sounds like he just took that garbage anonymous report, and based his complaint on it. Weak.
What a hero.
-
to me, the takeaway here is that SU looked at the report and found it credible. for those of us who are too lazy to bother but have our suspicions this is telling. that lawless and dolan are being officious would surprise exactly no one.
^ This might be the delusional nutter takeaway.
The real takeaway is that those who are too lazy to take the actual data and do their own analyses on which to base a complaint, will be immediately dismissed by adults.
-
wait so SU actually did this? If so I'm shocked and impressed.
Impressed?
I thought he was going to do an actual independent and valid analysis himself with the data. If he had based a complaint on THAT, it would have meant something.
It sounds like he just took that garbage anonymous report, and based his complaint on it. Weak.
What a hero.You think Steve is working for free?
-
It was not only a waste of time, but is was grossly counterproductive because all it accomplished was making him appear as a deranged cyber-stalking Iunatic.
Karl and his two nutjob followers are completely detached from reality.
Karl, emailing their school bosses is a total waste of your time. Obviously they are cor/rupt pieces of shy te, but this will accomplish nothing at all.
-
Honestly, I say chances are better than even that Brunet made the whole email up. I know both those editors. They don't write that way, they don't think that way. The language used in that alleged email borders on the silly. For example, no editor would say anything like "we respect your credentials" to a guy like SU.
He's li.ed about absolutely everything thus far; why would anyone believe him about anything now?
-
Of course.
No amount of logic or facts will cause you nutters to change your mind or opinion on anything.
No amount of complete and utter failure.
no I don't think that's the real takeaway, dedicated Enos stan. The takeaway is that SU, who dislikes Karl, still saw the report as worrisome enough to warrant investigation by ajps. Don't you get this? Of course you don't.
-
Honestly, I say chances are better than even that Brunet made the whole email up. I know both those editors. They don't write that way, they don't think that way. The language used in that alleged email borders on the silly. For example, no editor would say anything like "we respect your credentials" to a guy like SU.
He's li.ed about absolutely everything thus far; why would anyone believe him about anything now?lol. You are soooo scared.
-
^If it turns out that Karl did not make the email up, you will have acknowledged that Lawless and Dolan's language is silly. Karl has been reckless and irresponsible but so far he has not done outright fabrication.
Karl: can you give us hard evidence that all this took place and also confirm that SU was the brave phd who complained? More detail on what SU wrote would also help. Some of us are staying on the sidelines but would come forward publicly if there were grounding for all this.
-
And yet, those editors wrote that way. In spite of how well you know them.
*GASP*
Honestly, I say chances are better than even that Brunet made the whole email up. I know both those editors. They don't write that way, they don't think that way. The language used in that alleged email borders on the silly. For example, no editor would say anything like "we respect your credentials" to a guy like SU.
He's li.ed about absolutely everything thus far; why would anyone believe him about anything now?