^ scared
Update on AJPS / Harvard Corruption (Karlstack)
-
How many working political scientists on faculty anywhere on the planet have you convinced with your "valid" points of there being fraud?
Zero?Quite a few of us, I would guess. I am one, and have heard a few others talking about it. Will I be going public about my opinion? Of course not.
-
Quite a few of us, I would guess. I am one, and have heard a few others talking about it. Will I be going public about my opinion? Of course not.
It's plainly obvious you're one of the nuttters Iying to promote your narrative.
Give it a rest kid. You need help.Note that there are no polite, stable people defending Enos in these threads.
-
there's no need for anything. But Karl said that he would run everything and report back. That he didn't suggests he either is lying or couldn't figure out how to do it.why isn't karl capable of doing the work of tying to replicate the analysis himself? Why rely on an anonymous document?
he said he'd do it. That was months ago.
What gives?There exists sufficient information to start an investigation. There is no need for Karl or SU or anyone else to run any additional analyses. Enos owes the discipline an explanation of the irregularities in his data.
He set the expectations not me.