KD and JL have already served since 2018, no? Look at the past editors. They served a maximum of 4 years.
When will new AJPS editors take over?
-
Why so many Nay's? This is true.
I want to move the discipline as quickly, and as far, away from "appoint these women to be editors of our best journals for political reasons."
I don't know about you.lol yeah no, that's APSR. AJPS has two female lead editors, yes, but both respected scholars, and the associate editors include both men and women (3 men, 2 women). That's as close as you get to a 50/50 split as you can get with 7 people
-
lol yeah no, that's APSR. AJPS has two female lead editors, yes, but both respected scholars, and the associate editors include both men and women (3 men, 2 women). That's as close as you get to a 50/50 split as you can get with 7 people
You realize that they were chosen because the previous editor got meetooed (for silly allegations) right?
Or do you just have no clue what's going on our discipline?
-
lol yeah no, that's APSR. AJPS has two female lead editors, yes, but both respected scholars, and the associate editors include both men and women (3 men, 2 women). That's as close as you get to a 50/50 split as you can get with 7 people
You realize that they were chosen because the previous editor got meetooed (for silly allegations) right?
Or do you just have no clue what's going on our discipline?No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
-
No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
He came onto a woman at a group dinner.
He was then witch hunted to resign, and was replaced by a team of all women for political reasons.
You either do not know the story or are trolling.
-
lol yeah no, that's APSR. AJPS has two female lead editors, yes, but both respected scholars, and the associate editors include both men and women (3 men, 2 women). That's as close as you get to a 50/50 split as you can get with 7 people
You realize that they were chosen because the previous editor got meetooed (for silly allegations) right?
Or do you just have no clue what's going on our discipline?That’s a fact but nevertheless KD and JL simply are running the journal well. Obviously we can’t object to women editors per se. And even if they got the jobs due to silly calls for gender justice it doesn’t matter as long as they do well.
In any case it’s clearly true AJPS is the only well run top 3 right now.
-
lol yeah no, that's APSR. AJPS has two female lead editors, yes, but both respected scholars, and the associate editors include both men and women (3 men, 2 women). That's as close as you get to a 50/50 split as you can get with 7 people
You realize that they were chosen because the previous editor got meetooed (for silly allegations) right?
Or do you just have no clue what's going on our discipline?That’s a fact but nevertheless KD and JL simply are running the journal well. Obviously we can’t object to women editors per se. And even if they got the jobs due to silly calls for gender justice it doesn’t matter as long as they do well.
In any case it’s clearly true AJPS is the only well run top 3 right now.meh. JL is no better than others.
-
Well, no. He was booted after he used his position as editor of AJPS to defend himself publicly on the webpage of the journal. Regardless of whether the initial allegations are true, he was justifiably removed for that reason. Maybe he would have been booted anyway, we don't know the counterfactual.
No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
He came onto a woman at a group dinner.
He was then witch hunted to resign, and was replaced by a team of all women for political reasons.
You either do not know the story or are trolling. -
Calling bj a predator is every bit as insane as I have learned to expect from woke wyte womxn. He "preyed" on Graduate students in their 20s by coming on to them. Behavior of a person I like, no. Grounds for removal from any professional capacity? Maybe marriage counselor. You people are fiekcing prudes.
lol yeah no, that's APSR. AJPS has two female lead editors, yes, but both respected scholars, and the associate editors include both men and women (3 men, 2 women). That's as close as you get to a 50/50 split as you can get with 7 people
You realize that they were chosen because the previous editor got meetooed (for silly allegations) right?
Or do you just have no clue what's going on our discipline?No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
-
This is bs concocted by someone who would've been burning witches back in the day and saying it was because they refused to confess. Why do you think he felt he needed to defend himself in the first place? You are an apologist for woke witch hunts and should be ashamed of yourself as a person and scholar.
Well, no. He was booted after he used his position as editor of AJPS to defend himself publicly on the webpage of the journal. Regardless of whether the initial allegations are true, he was justifiably removed for that reason. Maybe he would have been booted anyway, we don't know the counterfactual.
No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
He came onto a woman at a group dinner.
He was then witch hunted to resign, and was replaced by a team of all women for political reasons.
You either do not know the story or are trolling. -
This is bs concocted by someone who would've been burning witches back in the day and saying it was because they refused to confess. Why do you think he felt he needed to defend himself in the first place? You are an apologist for woke witch hunts and should be ashamed of yourself as a person and scholar.
Well, no. He was booted after he used his position as editor of AJPS to defend himself publicly on the webpage of the journal. Regardless of whether the initial allegations are true, he was justifiably removed for that reason. Maybe he would have been booted anyway, we don't know the counterfactual.
No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
He came onto a woman at a group dinner.
He was then witch hunted to resign, and was replaced by a team of all women for political reasons.
You either do not know the story or are trolling. -
This is bs concocted by someone who would've been burning witches back in the day and saying it was because they refused to confess. Why do you think he felt he needed to defend himself in the first place? You are an apologist for woke witch hunts and should be ashamed of yourself as a person and scholar.
Well, no. He was booted after he used his position as editor of AJPS to defend himself publicly on the webpage of the journal. Regardless of whether the initial allegations are true, he was justifiably removed for that reason. Maybe he would have been booted anyway, we don't know the counterfactual.
No, because he wasn't "metooed for silly allegations" but removed for being a predator. And replaced with a good team - that is not exclusively female
He came onto a woman at a group dinner.
He was then witch hunted to resign, and was replaced by a team of all women for political reasons.
You either do not know the story or are trolling.