Marxism is as scientifically rigorous as Dianetics. And yet it is still taken seriously by many useful 1diots in the humanities and social sciences. Why is this? Are they just pretentious f00ls?
What's with the "science" thing? Did you just wake up from 1983?
The conceit of marxism is its alleged scientific realism.
Marxism is as scientifically rigorous as Dianetics. And yet it is still taken seriously by many useful 1diots in the humanities and social sciences. Why is this? Are they just pretentious f00ls?
Maybe read a book or two, Cletus.
This is what they do. If you don't spend 5 years earning a doctorate in marxist scholastics, your opinion is worthless to these clowns. Hey, marxist clown: maybe Karl Marx's books are bunkum and not worth five years of my time? I am not going to give Marx's writings the respect you think they're worth. I won't prostrate myself and throw grains of incense at your false god, Herr Marx.
With the Billionaire Class dominating politics, economics, and the news media
This is !00% wrong.
Politics: the donor class is to the far left of the public on culture, aligned on economics.
Economics: Consumption inequality has decreased. Wealth inequality is irrelevant except for the envious.
News media: lol
The problem is too much socialism/egalitarianism/collective action:
"San Francisco, Bay Area, and California governments are all single party. The state legislature will be single party supermajority forever. The governor will be the same party forever. The state, region, and city are precisely what their voters and donors want it to be."
With the Billionaire Class dominating politics, economics, and the news media -- you'd think everyone would finally acknowledge the obvious validity of Marx. Why do think Congress and Trump are openly denouncing socialism? Because it is inevitable.
Absolutely correct take
Marxism is as scientifically rigorous as Dianetics. And yet it is still taken seriously by many useful 1diots in the humanities and social sciences. Why is this? Are they just pretentious f00ls?
Maybe read a book or two, Cletus.
This is what they do. If you don't spend 5 years earning a doctorate in marxist scholastics, your opinion is worthless to these clowns. Hey, marxist clown: maybe Karl Marx's books are bunkum and not worth five years of my time? I am not going to give Marx's writings the respect you think they're worth. I won't prostrate myself and throw grains of incense at your false god, Herr Marx.
Can’t tell if you’re trooling or serious. Well done, Cletus!
Marxism is as scientifically rigorous as Dianetics. And yet it is still taken seriously by many useful 1diots in the humanities and social sciences. Why is this? Are they just pretentious f00ls?
Maybe read a book or two, Cletus.
This is what they do. If you don't spend 5 years earning a doctorate in marxist scholastics, your opinion is worthless to these clowns. Hey, marxist clown: maybe Karl Marx's books are bunkum and not worth five years of my time? I am not going to give Marx's writings the respect you think they're worth. I won't prostrate myself and throw grains of incense at your false god, Herr Marx.
This is what professors do. We read books and learn about things. Try it sometime
Marxism is as scientifically rigorous as Dianetics. And yet it is still taken seriously by many useful 1diots in the humanities and social sciences. Why is this? Are they just pretentious f00ls?
Maybe read a book or two, Cletus.
This is what they do. If you don't spend 5 years earning a doctorate in marxist scholastics, your opinion is worthless to these clowns. Hey, marxist clown: maybe Karl Marx's books are bunkum and not worth five years of my time? I am not going to give Marx's writings the respect you think they're worth. I won't prostrate myself and throw grains of incense at your false god, Herr Marx.This is what professors do. We read books and learn about things. Try it sometime
Marxism is malicious pseudo-science. But you think it's great just because a bunch of professors write books about it. That's what professors do. Keep malicious nonsense going by forming publishing cartels.
Marx fails because history can’t progress unless there’s a Hegelian Geist or unfolding Reason-in-History. Hegel fails because he is, as Voegelin noted, engaged in “sorcery” rather than philosophy.
Well, the American Revolution ("All Men are Created Equal"), the French Revolution ("Liberty, Equality, Fraternity") and the Russian Revolution ("Workers of the World Unite") prove Hegel correct. The next revolution will result in global socialism and world government.
Marx fails because history can’t progress unless there’s a Hegelian Geist or unfolding Reason-in-History. Hegel fails because he is, as Voegelin noted, engaged in “sorcery” rather than philosophy.
Well, the American Revolution ("All Men are Created Equal"), the French Revolution ("Liberty, Equality, Fraternity") and the Russian Revolution ("Workers of the World Unite") prove Hegel correct. The next revolution will result in global socialism and world government.
Lol. Tell me you know nothing of Hegel without telling me know nothing of Hegel.