Or will it maybe wait until next week?
Will this be the week Trump is indicted by NY?
-
He will probably be indicted in NY and in GA. NY case is flimsier than GA.
GA is not happening after the b@t-$h!t cr@zy jury fore(wo)man went public.
How exactly would that impact the viability of that case? Do you understand what grand juries do and the conditions under which they operate?
-
He will probably be indicted in NY and in GA. NY case is flimsier than GA.
GA is not happening after the b@t-$h!t cr@zy jury fore(wo)man went public.How exactly would that impact the viability of that case? Do you understand what grand juries do and the conditions under which they operate?
Let me put it this way - it's a prosecutorial nightmare.
-
He will probably be indicted in NY and in GA. NY case is flimsier than GA.
GA is not happening after the b@t-$h!t cr@zy jury fore(wo)man went public.
How exactly would that impact the viability of that case? Do you understand what grand juries do and the conditions under which they operate?Let me put it this way - it's a prosecutorial nightmare.
So now you’re asserting something different. But you still have no answer for how any of that could affect the viability of that case. All vibes.
-
"(2) Secrecy.
(B) Unless these rules provide otherwise, the following persons must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury:
(i) a grand juror."
There are exceptions, but Kohrs meets exactly none of them.Again. You’re not even looking at the right statutes.
You’re obviously not a polisci. Why do you post here?
-
"(2) Secrecy.
(B) Unless these rules provide otherwise, the following persons must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury:
(i) a grand juror."
There are exceptions, but Kohrs meets exactly none of them.Again. You’re not even looking at the right statutes.
You’re obviously not a polisci. Why do you post here?I'm sorry your narrative just crapped out, again. Maybe try and be less stvpid, and pretend that laws for conduct actually mean something.
-
"(2) Secrecy.
(B) Unless these rules provide otherwise, the following persons must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury:
(i) a grand juror."
There are exceptions, but Kohrs meets exactly none of them.
Again. You’re not even looking at the right statutes.
You’re obviously not a polisci. Why do you post here?I'm sorry your narrative just crapped out, again. Maybe try and be less stvpid, and pretend that laws for conduct actually mean something.
My friend, you are still very confused about what actual legal codes apply.
So again. Why do you persist in posting here? You’re clearly not a polisci.