how come maga supporters have no young charismatic leaders?
progressives have many.
also does this mean maga will dissolve with trump as he is their only leader?
Yeah, this Greta Thunberg girl is effing crazy
-
If I didn't say that, why would you assume that was my position? You'll need to try harder when you get to grad school.
Are you saying there are no reasonable disagreements with her?
I said "what would you consider", so I'm confused as to how I'm supposed to know what you think about stuff, particularly on an anonymous forum where any past interactions we may have had have vanished into the caverns of internet anonymity.
The fact that you are even asking is telling.
What would you consider to be "opposing viewpoints"?
I'm sure once she logs on to Political Science Rumors and sees this thread she'll quickly learn the error of her ways.
Pretty sure nothing could convince her she's wrong. Doesn't strike me as someone who is reading opposing viewpoints -
I know what you were trying to say. That the only opposing viewpoints are antiscience climate change deniers and so aren't worth listening to
Now you're trying to weasel out of it
If I didn't say that, why would you assume that was my position? You'll need to try harder when you get to grad school.
Are you saying there are no reasonable disagreements with her?
I said "what would you consider", so I'm confused as to how I'm supposed to know what you think about stuff, particularly on an anonymous forum where any past interactions we may have had have vanished into the caverns of internet anonymity.
The fact that you are even asking is telling.
What would you consider to be "opposing viewpoints"?
I'm sure once she logs on to Political Science Rumors and sees this thread she'll quickly learn the error of her ways.
Pretty sure nothing could convince her she's wrong. Doesn't strike me as someone who is reading opposing viewpoints -
I'll repost since my last reply was deleted.
This isn't how political science works, young man. You have to answer questions and use evidence.
I know what you were trying to say. That the only opposing viewpoints are antiscience climate change deniers and so aren't worth listening to
Now you're trying to weasel out of it -
Are all the political scientists who are retweeting Greta doing that?
I'll repost since my last reply was deleted.
This isn't how political science works, young man. You have to answer questions and use evidence.
I know what you were trying to say. That the only opposing viewpoints are antiscience climate change deniers and so aren't worth listening to
Now you're trying to weasel out of it -
how come maga supporters have no young charismatic leaders?
Milo Y.
LOL the same guy whose career is ending in disgrace?
exactly, maga supporters have no charismatic young leaders, so you all are jealous of the energy behind young progressive leaders like greta and aoc etc
wow, nobody likes you magaboys! sad!
-
This is called "moving the goalposts" and it's fine for you to do that as part of a conversation, but it's important that we acknowledge that you didn't engage on the previous topic.
I think all political scientists who use twitter are just attention seeking and you could basically make any argument against them and I'd agree with you. It's interesting that they're unable to say anything more interesting than a child, though.
Are all the political scientists who are retweeting Greta doing that?
I'll repost since my last reply was deleted.
This isn't how political science works, young man. You have to answer questions and use evidence.
I know what you were trying to say. That the only opposing viewpoints are antiscience climate change deniers and so aren't worth listening to
Now you're trying to weasel out of it -
I know what you were trying to say. That the only opposing viewpoints are antiscience climate change deniers and so aren't worth listening to
Now you're trying to weasel out of itActually, the opposing viewpoints are that the hysteria being drummed up ppl like this girl are unnecessary and that the plans being proposed by those leading the hysteria don't work.
And I know this is true because whenever I get one of you to actually engage semi-substantively on actual plans it always ends with your side saying, "We have to try SOMETHING!!!".
In addition, as I try to hold you to the hysteria metric of X amount of degrees until apocalypse, without fail that degree keeps getting higher and the apocalypse turns into a "may happen" scenario, which for me is even more terrifying because you don't know where apocalypse starts and yet, you seem to be willing to keep pushing that cutoff degree higher and higher.
-
I'd love to see a single argument you've had on here where that's happened.
I know that Fox News and the Daily Caller tell you that's how our side of the argument goes, but it really, really doesn't.
And I know this is true because whenever I get one of you to actually engage semi-substantively on actual plans it always ends with your side saying, "We have to try SOMETHING!!!".
In addition, as I try to hold you to the hysteria metric of X amount of degrees until apocalypse, without fail that degree keeps getting higher and the apocalypse turns into a "may happen" scenario, which for me is even more terrifying because you don't know where apocalypse starts and yet, you seem to be willing to keep pushing that cutoff degree higher and higher. -
Michelyne, if you have found that you don’t ever have satisfying or productive debates here, why do you persist in initiating them? And have you considered that maybe they are not satisfying or productive because you don’t approach them in good faith? It’s also sort of embarrassing for you to admit your the same person who is behind all of these anointing posts, but that’s your business. Trolls gonna troll.