That's for sure.
The power of the media is immense and they have now perfected turning Trump's momentum in the media against him.
Just looking at how susceptible so many people are to simple and obvious emotional outrage is sad.
Yesterday was a small scale tragedy, but it is being overhyped
-
That's for sure.
The power of the media is immense and they have now perfected turning Trump's momentum in the media against him.
Just looking at how susceptible so many people are to simple and obvious emotional outrage is sad.A sitting president (incompetently) attempting a self-coup is the fault of "the media"?
-
reichstag fire moment for globalism
They've won, man. Samizdat is the only choice the right will have in 30 days. They're gonna crush trump, and defending him will be either pointless because of the media and censorship, or require an entire book of preface to every point.
-
That's for sure.
The power of the media is immense and they have now perfected turning Trump's momentum in the media against him.
Just looking at how susceptible so many people are to simple and obvious emotional outrage is sad.A sitting president (incompetently) attempting a self-coup is the fault of "the media"?
You're an 1mb3c1le.
-
That's for sure.
The power of the media is immense and they have now perfected turning Trump's momentum in the media against him.
Just looking at how susceptible so many people are to simple and obvious emotional outrage is sad.
A sitting president (incompetently) attempting a self-coup is the fault of "the media"?You're an 1mb3c1le.
Enlighten me.
Please explain how a sitting president fomenting a mob to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power in an effort to illegally remain in office is the fault of "the media"?
-
That's for sure.
The power of the media is immense and they have now perfected turning Trump's momentum in the media against him.
Just looking at how susceptible so many people are to simple and obvious emotional outrage is sad.
A sitting president (incompetently) attempting a self-coup is the fault of "the media"?
You're an 1mb3c1le.Enlighten me.
Please explain how a sitting president fomenting a mob to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power in an effort to illegally remain in office is the fault of "the media"?You can't even have a conversation without setting the stage. It's pointless to talk to you. You rely on a media narrative to self examine a media narrative. You're an 1mb3c1le.
-
You can't even have a conversation without setting the stage. It's pointless to talk to you. You rely on a media narrative to self examine a media narrative. You're an 1mb3c1le.
Enlighten me. I'm genuinely curious.
How was the assault on the US Capitol yesterday a "media narrative"?
-
You can't even have a conversation without setting the stage. It's pointless to talk to you. You rely on a media narrative to self examine a media narrative. You're an 1mb3c1le.
Enlighten me. I'm genuinely curious.
How was the assault on the US Capitol yesterday a "media narrative"?"Assault"
Contextualized like a being without long term memory
-
You can't even have a conversation without setting the stage. It's pointless to talk to you. You rely on a media narrative to self examine a media narrative. You're an 1mb3c1le.
Enlighten me. I'm genuinely curious.
How was the assault on the US Capitol yesterday a "media narrative"?"Assault"
Contextualized like a being without long term memoryEnlighten me
-
If it takes an entire book to twist the logic far enough that you can set the stage for your argument, then your argument is probably sheit.
It's not avout twisting logic. It's about noting context. Isn't it funny how you poison the well merely to state a proposition?
Remember all in 2020 when leftists were occupying government buildings? This lasted like three hours...
Like I said, you're an 1mb3c1le that doesn't process information at a level complex ebough to offer anythong different from the m0r0ns on cable news. Congrats, though, I'm sure You're more successful tham me.
-
If it takes an entire book to twist the logic far enough that you can set the stage for your argument, then your argument is probably sheit.
It's not avout twisting logic. It's about noting context. Isn't it funny how you poison the well merely to state a proposition?
Remember all in 2020 when leftists were occupying government buildings? This lasted like three hours...
Like I said, you're an 1mb3c1le that doesn't process information at a level complex ebough to offer anythong different from the m0r0ns on cable news. Congrats, though, I'm sure You're more successful tham me.Unless you're a tenured full professor at a fancier school than mine, then yes -- I am more successful than you. Stings, doesn't it?
But back to the question at hand -- Please explain how a sitting president fomenting a mob to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power in an effort to illegally remain in office is the fault of "the media"?
-
"to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power "
You have precisely proof that was Trump's intention. You imbue that onto the situation in order to make semse of the facts. And the facts you select reveal the parameters pf what you consider as context, as does your choice of language color what direction you send semantic content into syntactic, I.e., part of your argument is only implied through language, devoid of argument in favor of parameters.
You're not a smart person.
-
"to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power "
You have precisely proof that was Trump's intention.Sure I do, from Trump's own mouth:
"These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!"